Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33481776›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2021

Integrated psychosocial, economic strengthening, and clinical service-delivery to improve health and resilience of adolescents living with HIV and their caregivers: Findings from a prospective cohort study in Zambia.

Joseph G Rosen, Lyson Phiri, Mwelwa Chibuye, Edith S Namukonda, Michael T Mbizvo, Nkomba Kayeyi

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph G RosenPopulation Council, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0003-4991-4033
Lyson PhiriPopulation Council, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0001-9499-8665
Mwelwa ChibuyePopulation Council, Lusaka, Zambia.
Edith S NamukondaPopulation Council, Lusaka, Zambia.
Michael T MbizvoPopulation Council, Lusaka, Zambia.
Nkomba KayeyiPopulation Council, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0002-4043-5872
National HIV/AIDS/STI/TB Council · ZM

Funding

PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren and youth are profoundly impacted groups in Zambia's HIV epidemic. To evaluate delivery of integrated psychosocial, economic strengthening, and clinical services to HIV-affected households through the Zambia Family (ZAMFAM) Project, a prospective cohort study compared socio-economic, psychosocial, and health outcomes among ZAMFAM beneficiaries to non-beneficiaries.

methodsIn July-October 2017, 544 adolescents living with HIV (ALHIV) aged 5-17 years and their adult caregivers were recruited from Central (ZAMFAM implementation sites) and Eastern (non-intervention sites) Provinces. Structured interviews at baseline and one-year follow-up assessed household characteristics, socio-economic wellbeing, and health service utilization. Poisson regression with generalized estimating equations measured one-year changes in key health and socio-economic indicators, comparing ZAMFAM beneficiaries to non-beneficiaries.

resultsOverall, 494 households completed two rounds of assessment (retention rate: 91%) Among ALHIV, improvements in current antiretroviral therapy use over time (Adjusted Prevalence Rate Ratio [aPRR] = 1.06, 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI]: 1.01-1.11) and reductions in non-household labor (aPRR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.20-0.99) were significantly larger among ZAMFAM beneficiaries than non-beneficiaries. For caregivers, receiving ZAMFAM services was associated with significant reductions in HIV-related stigma (aPRR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.28-0.88) and perceived negative community attitudes towards HIV (aPRR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.62-0.96). Improvements in caregiver capacity to pay for unexpected (aPRR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.17-2.04) and food-related expenses (aPRR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.16-1.90), as well as shared decision-making authority in household spending (aPRR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.04-1.93) and self-reported good or very good health status (aPRR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.14-1.87), were also significantly larger among ZAMFAM beneficiaries.

conclusionsSignificant improvements in caregivers' financial capacity were observed among households receiving ZAMFAM services, with few changes in health or wellbeing among ALHIV. Integrated service-delivery approaches like ZAMFAM may yield observable socio-economic improvements in the short-term. Strengthening community-based delivery of psychosocial and health support to ALHIV is encouraged.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth StatusResilience, PsychologicalSocioeconomic FactorsAdolescentAdultCaregiversChildChild Health ServicesChild, PreschoolFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID33481776
PMCPMC7822390
OpenAlexW3124312456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.