Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33481760›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2021

Use of Telehealth in Substance Use Disorder Services During and After COVID-19: Online Survey Study.

Todd Molfenter, Nancy Roget, Michael Chaple, Stephanie Behlman, Olivia Cody, Bryan Hartzler, Edward Johnson, Maureen Nichols, Patricia Stilen, Sara Becker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Program Director Reports of COVID-19 Lockdown-Driven Service Changes in Community-Based STI Clinics and Syringe Services Programs in the Southeastern U.S.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2024
    Article
  13. Patient and provider attitudes toward video and phone telemental health care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Todd Molfenter *Center for Health Enhancement System Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3033-416X
Nancy Roget *Center for the Application of Substance Abuse Technologies, University of Nevada-Reno, Reno, NV, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3994-4474
Michael Chaple *New York State Psychiatric Institute, Division on Substance Use Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7119-4576
Stephanie Behlman *Center for Health Enhancement System Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4893-1571
Olivia Cody *Center for Health Enhancement System Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3085-6067
Bryan HartzlerAlcohol & Drug Abuse Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7052-2280
Edward JohnsonNational Center for Primary Care, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1727-2657
Maureen NicholsAddiction Research Institute, Steve Hicks School of Social Work, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7865-3376
Patricia StilenSchool of Nursing and Health Studies, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9306-5732
Sara Becker *Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9271-2432

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial distancing guidelines for COVID-19 have caused a rapid transition to telephone and video technologies for delivering treatment for substance use disorders (SUDs).

objectiveThis study examined the adoption of these technologies across the SUD service continuum, acceptance of these technologies among service providers, and intent of providers to use these technologies after the pandemic. Additional analysis using the validated technology acceptance model (TAM) was performed to test the potential applications of these technologies after the pandemic. The study objectives were as follows: (1) to assess the use of telehealth (telephone and video technologies) for different SUD services during COVID-19 in May-June 2020, (2) to assess the intended applications of telehealth for SUD services beyond COVID-19, (3) to evaluate the perceived ease of use and value of telehealth for delivering SUD services, and (4) to assess organizational readiness for the sustained use of telehealth services.

methodsAn online survey on the use of telephonic and video services was distributed between May and August 2020 to measure the current use of these services, perceived organizational readiness to use these services, and the intent to use these services after COVID-19. In total, 8 of 10 regional Addiction Technology Transfer Centers representing 43 states distributed the survey. Individual organizations were the unit of analysis.

resultsIn total, 457 organizations responded to the survey. Overall, the technology was widely used; >70% (n>335) of organizations reported using telephone or video platforms for most services. The odds of the intent of organizations to use these technologies to deliver services post COVID-19 were significantly greater for all but two services (ie, telephonic residential counseling and buprenorphine therapy; mean odds ratio 3.79, range 1.87-6.98). Clinical users preferred video technologies to telephone technologies for virtually all services. Readiness to use telephone and video technologies was high across numerous factors, though telephonic services were considered more accessible. Consistent with the TAM, perceived usefulness and ease of use influenced the intent to use both telephone and video technologies.

conclusionsThe overall perceived ease of use and usefulness of telephonic and video services suggest promising post-COVID-19 applications of these services. Survey participants consistently preferred video services to telephonic services; however, the availability of telephonic services to those lacking easy access to video technology is an important characteristic of these services. Future studies should review the acceptance of telehealth services and their comparative impact on SUD care outcomes.

Indexed as

COVID-19substance use disorderstechnology acceptance modeltelehealth

Identifiers

PMID33481760
PMCPMC7895293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.