Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33481759›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

The Use of Digital Platforms for Adults' and Adolescents' Physical Activity During the COVID-19 Pandemic (Our Life at Home): Survey Study.

Kate Parker, Riaz Uddin, Nicola D Ridgers, Helen Brown, Jenny Veitch, Jo Salmon, Anna Timperio, Shannon Sahlqvist, Samuel Cassar, Kim Toffoletti and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Systematic review of electronically delivered behavioral obesity prevention interventions targeting men.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Changes in Physical Activity Patterns Due to the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Effectiveness of Physical Activity Interventions among Rural Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kate ParkerInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8301-1391
Riaz UddinInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8133-9732
Nicola D RidgersInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5713-3515
Helen BrownInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5460-3654
Jenny VeitchInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8962-0887
Jo SalmonInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4734-6354
Anna TimperioInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8773-5012
Shannon SahlqvistInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3714-9533
Samuel CassarInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6968-7910
Kim ToffolettiSchool of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts and Education, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5672-9090
Ralph MaddisonInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8564-5518
Lauren ArundellInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8178-4104

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGovernment responses to managing the COVID-19 pandemic may have impacted the way individuals were able to engage in physical activity. Digital platforms are a promising way to support physical activity levels and may have provided an alternative for people to maintain their activity while at home.

objectiveThis study aimed to examine associations between the use of digital platforms and adherence to the physical activity guidelines among Australian adults and adolescents during the COVID-19 stay-at-home restrictions in April and May 2020.

methodsA national online survey was distributed in May 2020. Participants included 1188 adults (mean age 37.4 years, SD 15.1; 980/1188, 82.5% female) and 963 adolescents (mean age 16.2 years, SD 1.2; 685/963, 71.1% female). Participants reported demographic characteristics, use of digital platforms for physical activity over the previous month, and adherence to moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) and muscle-strengthening exercise (MSE) guidelines. Multilevel logistic regression models examined differences in guideline adherence between those who used digital platforms (ie, users) to support their physical activity compared to those who did not (ie, nonusers).

resultsDigital platforms include streaming services for exercise (eg, YouTube, Instagram, and Facebook); subscriber fitness programs, via an app or online (eg, Centr and MyFitnessPal); facilitated online live or recorded classes, via platforms such as Zoom (eg, dance, sport training, and fitness class); sport- or activity-specific apps designed by sporting organizations for participants to keep up their skills (eg, TeamBuildr); active electronic games (eg, Xbox Kinect); and/or online or digital training or racing platforms (eg, Zwift, FullGaz, and Rouvy). Overall, 39.5% (469/1188) of adults and 26.5% (255/963) of adolescents reported using digital platforms for physical activity. Among adults, MVPA (odds ratio [OR] 2.0, 95% CI 1.5-2.7), MSE (OR 3.3, 95% CI 2.5-4.5), and combined (OR 2.7, 95% CI 2.0-3.8) guideline adherence were higher among digital platform users relative to nonusers. Adolescents' MVPA (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.3-4.3), MSE (OR 3.1, 95% CI 2.1-4.4), and combined (OR 4.3, 95% CI 2.1-9.0) guideline adherence were also higher among users of digital platforms relative to nonusers.

conclusionsDigital platform users were more likely than nonusers to meet MVPA and MSE guidelines during the COVID-19 stay-at-home restrictions in April and May 2020. Digital platforms may play a critical role in helping to support physical activity engagement when access to facilities or opportunities for physical activity outside the home are restricted.

Indexed as

COVID-19ExerciseGuideline AdherenceResistance TrainingSocial MediaVideo GamesWebcasts as TopicAdolescentAdultAustraliaFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsCOVID-19digital healthmoderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activitymuscle-strengthening exerciseonline platforms

Identifiers

PMID33481759
PMCPMC7857525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.