Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33481339›Full record

SynthesisThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2021

Immune cell infiltrates as prognostic biomarkers in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Andrew J McGuigan, Helen G Coleman, R Stephen McCain, Paul J Kelly, David I Johnston, Mark A Taylor, Richard C Turkington

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Panoramic tumor microenvironment in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew J McGuiganThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5097-5063
Helen G ColemanThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4872-7877
R Stephen McCainCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5357-1622
Paul J KellyDepartment of Tissue Pathology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
David I JohnstonNorthern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Mark A TaylorDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mater Hospital, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Richard C TurkingtonThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3164-1890
Queen's University Belfast · GBBelfast Health and Social Care Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK Career Establishment Award 2018-2024 C37703/A25820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune cell infiltration has been identified as a prognostic biomarker in several cancers. However, no immune based biomarker has yet been validated for use in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of immune cell infiltration, measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC), as a prognostic biomarker in PDAC. All other IHC prognostic biomarkers in PDAC were also summarised. MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched between 1998 and 2018. Studies investigating IHC biomarkers and prognosis in PDAC were included. REMARK score and Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used for qualitative analysis. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to pool results, where possible. Twenty-six articles studied immune cell infiltration IHC biomarkers and PDAC prognosis. Meta-analysis found high infiltration with CD4 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.51-0.83.) and CD8 (HR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.55-0.84.) T-lymphocytes associated with better disease-free survival. Reduced overall survival was associated with high CD163 (HR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.03-2.56). Infiltration of CD3, CD20, FoxP3 and CD68 cells, and PD-L1 expression was not prognostic. In total, 708 prognostic biomarkers were identified in 1101 studies. In summary, high CD4 and CD8 infiltration are associated with better disease-free survival in PDAC. Increased CD163 is adversely prognostic. Despite the publication of 708 IHC prognostic biomarkers in PDAC, none has been validated for clinical use. Further research should focus on reproducibility of prognostic biomarkers in PDAC in order to achieve this.

Indexed as

Antigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkersCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCD163 AntigenCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesDisease-Free SurvivalHumansImmunohistochemistryPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisReceptors, Cell SurfaceReproducibility of ResultsAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkersCD163 AntigenCD274 protein, humanReceptors, Cell Surfaceimmune infiltrationimmunohistochemistrymeta-analysispancreatic cancerprognostic biomarkersystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33481339
PMCPMC7869931
OpenAlexW3123633781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.