Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33481055›Full record

ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2021

[Change in psychological burden during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: fears, individual behavior, and the relevance of information and trust in governmental institutions].

Eva-Maria Skoda, Anke Spura, Freia De Bock, Adam Schweda, Nora Dörrie, Madeleine Fink, Venja Musche, Benjamin Weismüller, Anke Benecke, Hannah Kohler and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eva-Maria SkodaKlinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, LVR-Klinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Virchowstr. 174, 45147, Essen, Deutschland. eva-maria.skoda@uni-due.de.
Anke SpuraBundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung (BZgA), Köln, Deutschland.
Freia De BockBundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung (BZgA), Köln, Deutschland.
Adam SchwedaKlinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, LVR-Klinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Virchowstr. 174, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
Nora DörrieKlinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, LVR-Klinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Virchowstr. 174, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
Madeleine FinkKlinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, LVR-Klinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Virchowstr. 174, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
Venja MuscheKlinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, LVR-Klinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Virchowstr. 174, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
Benjamin WeismüllerKlinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, LVR-Klinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Virchowstr. 174, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
Anke BeneckeKlinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, LVR-Klinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Virchowstr. 174, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
Hannah KohlerKlinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, LVR-Klinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Virchowstr. 174, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
Florian JunneAbteilung für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Johanna GrafAbteilung für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Alexander BäuerleKlinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, LVR-Klinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Virchowstr. 174, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
Martin TeufelKlinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, LVR-Klinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Virchowstr. 174, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
University of Duisburg-Essen · DEFederal Centre for Health Education · DEUniversitätsklinikum Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health was evident early on. The extent of the effects, especially cumulative over the long period of the pandemic, has not yet been fully investigated for Germany.

objectivesThe aim of the study was to determine psychological burden as well as COVID-19-related experience and behavior patterns and to show how they changed during the different phases of the pandemic in Germany. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe Germany-wide online-based cross-sectional study (03/10-07/27/2020) included 22,961 people (convenience sample). Generalized anxiety (GAD-7), depression (PHQ-2), and psychological distress (DT) were collected, as well as COVID-19-related experiences and behavior patterns: COVID-19-related fear, trust in governmental actions, subjective level of information, adherent safety behavior, and personal risk assessment for infection/severe course of illness. The pandemic was retrospectively divided into five phases (initial, crisis, lockdown, reorientation, and new normality).

resultsCompared to pre-COVID-19 reference values, GAD‑7, PHQ‑2, and DT levels were significantly elevated and persistent throughout the different phases of the pandemic. COVID-19-related fear, information level, trust, safety behavior, and the risk assessment for infection/severe course of illness showed, after initial strong increase, a strong decrease to partly below the initial value. Exceptions were constant risk assessments of having a severe course of illness or dying of it.

conclusionsThe increased levels of psychological burden, which have persisted throughout all phases of the pandemic, illustrate the need for sustainable support services. Declining values over the duration of the pandemic in terms of trust in governmental actions and the feeling of being well informed underline the need for more targeted education.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAnxietyCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesFearGermanyHumansRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2TrustDepressionGeneralized anxietyPandemic phasesPsychological distressSARS-CoV‑2

Identifiers

PMID33481055
PMCPMC7821178
OpenAlexW3122610986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.