Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33480438›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2021

Automated approach for segmenting gross tumor volumes for lung cancer stereotactic body radiation therapy using CT-based dense V-networks.

Yunhao Cui, Hidetaka Arimura, Risa Nakano, Tadamasa Yoshitake, Yoshiyuki Shioyama, Hidetake Yabuuchi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Survey on Deep Learning for Precision Oncology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yunhao CuiDepartment of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Hidetaka ArimuraDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Risa NakanoDepartment of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Tadamasa YoshitakeDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Yoshiyuki ShioyamaSaga International Heavy Ion Cancer Treatment Foundation, 3049 Harakogamachi, Tosu-shi, Saga 841-0071, Japan.
Hidetake YabuuchiDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Kyushu University · JPSAGA Heavy Ion Medical Accelerator in Tosu · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop an automated segmentation approach for small gross tumor volumes (GTVs) in 3D planning computed tomography (CT) images using dense V-networks (DVNs) that offer more advantages in segmenting smaller structures than conventional V-networks. Regions of interest (ROI) with dimensions of 50 × 50 × 6-72 pixels in the planning CT images were cropped based on the GTV centroids when applying stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to patients. Segmentation accuracy of GTV contours for 192 lung cancer patients [with the following tumor types: 118 solid, 53 part-solid types and 21 pure ground-glass opacity (pure GGO)], who underwent SBRT, were evaluated based on a 10-fold cross-validation test using Dice's similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). For each case, 11 segmented GTVs consisting of three single outputs, four logical AND outputs, and four logical OR outputs from combinations of two or three outputs from DVNs were obtained by three runs with different initial weights. The AND output (combination of three outputs) achieved the highest values of average 3D-DSC (0.832 ± 0.074) and HD (4.57 ± 2.44 mm). The average 3D DSCs from the AND output for solid, part-solid and pure GGO types were 0.838 ± 0.074, 0.822 ± 0.078 and 0.819 ± 0.059, respectively. This study suggests that the proposed approach could be useful in segmenting GTVs for planning lung cancer SBRT.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiosurgeryTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAutomationFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedTumor Burdendeep learningdense V-networkslung stereotactic body radiation therapysegmentation

Identifiers

PMID33480438
PMCPMC7948852
OpenAlexW3123691646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.