ArticleESC heart failure2021
Complications of left ventricular assist devices causing high urgency status on waiting list: impact on outcome after heart transplantation.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes among patients bridged to heart transplant with microaxial flow versus durable left ventricular assist device support.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Cardiac Transplantation in Heart Failure Patients with Previous Mechanical Cardiocirculatory Support.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Edge-to-Edge mitral valve repair for preoperative bridging to heart transplantation.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024Article
- The Prognostic Role of Pulmonary Arterial Elastance in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The Predictive Role of Metabolic Volume Segmentation Compared to Semiquantitative PET Parameters in Diagnosis of LVAD Infection using [Molecular imaging and biology · 2024Article
- Advanced Heart Failure: Therapeutic Options and Challenges in the Evolving Field of Left Ventricular Assist Devices.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Surgical Interventions for Late Aortic Valve Regurgitation Associated with Continuous Flow-Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy: Experience Gained and Lessons Learned.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Impact of Left Ventricular Assist Devices on Days Alive and Out of Hospital in Hemodynamically Stable Patients with End-Stage Heart Failure: A Propensity Score Matched Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- IgM-enriched immunoglobulin as adjuvant therapy for heart transplant after infection of left ventricular assist devices.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
- Days alive and out of hospital after left ventricular assist device implantation.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
- Impact of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation of Donors on Days Alive and Out of Hospital after Orthotopic Heart Transplantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Evolution of thrombolytic therapy in patients with HeartWare ventricular assist device thrombosis: a single-institutional experience.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2022Article
- Impact of pretransplant left ventricular assist device support duration on outcome after heart transplantation.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2022Article
- Complications of left ventricular assist devices causing high urgency status on waiting list: impact on outcome after heart transplantation.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsHeart transplantation (HTx) represents optimal care for advanced heart failure. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are often needed as a bridge-to-transplant (BTT) therapy to support patients during the wait for a donor organ. Prolonged support increases the risk for LVAD complications that may affect the outcome after HTx. METHODS AND
resultsA total of 342 patients undergoing HTx after LVAD as BTT in a 10-year period in two German high-volume HTx centres were retrospectively analysed. While 73 patients were transplanted without LVAD complications and with regular waiting list status (T, n = 73), the remaining 269 patients were transplanted with high urgency status (HU) and further divided with regard to the observed leading LVAD complications (infection: HU1, n = 91; thrombosis: HU2, n = 32; stroke: HU3, n = 38; right heart failure: HU4, n = 41; arrhythmia: HU5, n = 23; bleeding: HU6, n = 18; device malfunction: HU7, n = 26). Postoperative hospitalization was prolonged in patients with LVAD complications. Analyses of perioperative morbidity revealed no differences regarding primary graft dysfunction, renal failure, and neurological events except postoperative infections. Short-term survival, as well as Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, indicated comparable results between the different study groups without disadvantages for patients with LVAD complications.
conclusionsLeft ventricular assist device therapy can impair the outcome after HTx. However, the occurrence of LVAD complications may not impact on outcome after HTx. Thus, we cannot support the prioritization or discrimination of HTx candidates according to distinct mechanical circulatory support-associated complications. Future allocation strategies have to respect that device-related complications may define urgency but do not impact on the outcome after HTx.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.