Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33480066›Full record

SynthesisPrenatal diagnosis2021

The prognosis of common arterial trunk from a fetal perspective: A prenatal cohort study and systematic literature review.

Amber E L van Nisselrooij, Lotta Herling, Sally-Ann Clur, Ingeborg H Linskens, Eva Pajkrt, Lukas A Rammeloo, Arend D J Ten Harkel, Mark G Hazekamp, Nico A Blom, Monique C Haak

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Prenatal diagnosis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Amber E L van NisselrooijDepartment of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1752-5834
Lotta HerlingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Fetal Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sally-Ann ClurDepartment of Paediatric Cardiology, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Ingeborg H LinskensDepartment of Obstetrics, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Eva PajkrtDepartment of Obstetrics, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Lukas A RammelooDepartment of Paediatric Cardiology, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Arend D J Ten HarkelDepartment of Paediatric Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Mark G HazekampDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Nico A BlomDepartment of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Monique C HaakDepartment of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe limited number of large fetal cohort studies on common arterial trunk (CAT) impedes prenatal counseling at midgestation. This study evaluates the prognosis of CAT from a fetal perspective.

methodFetuses with a prenatally diagnosed CAT were extracted from the PRECOR registry (2002-2016). We evaluated fetal and postnatal survival and the presence of additional morbidity at last follow-up. Literature databases were searches systematically for additional cases.

resultsThirty-eight cases with a prenatal diagnosis of CAT were identified in our registry, of which 18/38 (47%) opted for pregnancy termination (TOP). Two cases resulted in spontaneous intrauterine demise (10%, 2/20), six cases demised postnatally (33%, 6/18), leaving 60% (12/20) alive, after exclusion of TOP, at a mean age of six (range: 2-10 years). Additional morbidity was found in 42% (5/12) of survivors, including 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, Adams-Oliver syndrome and intestinal atresia, whereas 8% (1/12) had developmental delay. The remaining 30% (6/12) of survivors appeared isolated with normal development. All of whom six required replacement of the initial right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit. Additionally, we reviewed 197 literature cases on short-term outcome.

conclusionThe risk of fetal and neonatal demise, as well as significant morbidity amongst survivors, should be included in prenatal counseling for CAT.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesEchocardiographyFemaleFetusHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansInfant, NewbornNetherlandsPregnancyPrenatal CarePrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID33480066
PMCPMC8248090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.