Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33479924›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2021

Care Coordination Strategies and Barriers during Medication Safety Incidents: a Qualitative, Cognitive Task Analysis.

Alissa L Russ-Jara, Cherie L Luckhurst, Rachel A Dismore, Karen J Arthur, Amanda P Ifeachor, Laura G Militello, Peter A Glassman, Alan J Zillich, Michael Weiner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Alissa L Russ-JaraCenter for Health Information and Communication, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service CIN 13-416, Indianapolis, IN, USA. alissajara@purdue.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2841-8401
Cherie L LuckhurstCenter for Health Information and Communication, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service CIN 13-416, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Rachel A DismoreCenter for Health Information and Communication, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service CIN 13-416, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Karen J ArthurRichard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Amanda P IfeachorRichard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Laura G MilitelloApplied Decision Science, Dayton, OH, USA.
Peter A GlassmanPharmacy Benefits Management Services, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington DC, USA.
Alan J ZillichDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Michael WeinerCenter for Health Information and Communication, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service CIN 13-416, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
United States Department of Veterans Affairs · USRichard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center · USApplied Decision Science (United States) · USIndiana University Health · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

VA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication errors are prevalent in healthcare institutions worldwide, often arising from difficulties in care coordination among primary care providers, specialists, and pharmacists. Greater knowledge about care coordination surrounding medication safety incidents can inform efforts to improve patient safety.

objectivesTo identify strategies that hospital and outpatient healthcare professionals (HCPs) use, and barriers encountered, when they coordinate care during a medication safety incident involving an adverse drug reaction, drug-drug interaction, or drug-renal concern.

designWe asked HCPs to complete a form whenever they encountered these incidents and intervened to prevent or mitigate patient harm. We stratified incidents across HCP roles and incident categories to conduct follow-up cognitive task analysis interviews with HCPs.

participantsWe invited all physicians and pharmacists working in inpatient or outpatient care at a tertiary Veterans Affairs Medical Center. We examined 24 incidents: 12 from physicians and 12 from pharmacists, with a total of 8 incidents per category. APPROACH: Interviews were transcribed and analyzed via a two-stage inductive, qualitative analysis. In stage 1, we analyzed each incident to identify decision requirements. In stage 2, we analyzed results across incidents to identify emergent themes. KEY

resultsMost incidents (19, 79%) were from outpatient care. HCPs relied on four main strategies to coordinate care: cognitive decentering; collaborative decision-making; back-up behaviors; and contingency planning. HCPs encountered four main barriers: role ambiguity and constraints, breakdowns (e.g., delays) in care, challenges related to the electronic health record, and factors that increased coordination complexity. Each strategy and barrier occurred across all incident categories and HCP groups. Pharmacists went to extra effort to ensure safety plans were implemented.

conclusionsSimilar strategies and barriers were evident across HCP groups and incident types. Strategies for enhancing patient safety may be strengthened by deliberate organizational support. Some barriers could be addressed by improving work systems.

Indexed as

Medication ErrorsPharmacistsCognitionHealth PersonnelHumansPatient Safetyadverse drug eventcare coordinationhuman factors engineeringmedication errorsmedication managementpatient safety

Identifiers

PMID33479924
PMCPMC8342616
OpenAlexW3125866382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.