Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33479869›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2021

Posture influences on vestibulospinal tract excitability.

Hiroaki Tanaka, Junji Nakamura, Tomoyuki Siozaki, Kozo Ueta, Shu Morioka, Koji Shomoto, Yohei Okada

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroaki TanakaGraduate School of Health Sciences, Kio University, 4-2-2 Umami-naka, Koryo-cho, Kitakatsuragigun, Nara, 635-0832, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5231-5325
Junji NakamuraGraduate School of Health Sciences, Kio University, 4-2-2 Umami-naka, Koryo-cho, Kitakatsuragigun, Nara, 635-0832, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4772-5239
Tomoyuki SiozakiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1619-5087
Kozo UetaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Japan Community Healthcare Organization, Hoshigaoka Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5884-8413
Shu MoriokaGraduate School of Health Sciences, Kio University, 4-2-2 Umami-naka, Koryo-cho, Kitakatsuragigun, Nara, 635-0832, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2853-1789
Koji ShomotoGraduate School of Health Sciences, Kio University, 4-2-2 Umami-naka, Koryo-cho, Kitakatsuragigun, Nara, 635-0832, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2977-1752
Yohei OkadaGraduate School of Health Sciences, Kio University, 4-2-2 Umami-naka, Koryo-cho, Kitakatsuragigun, Nara, 635-0832, Japan. y.okada@kio.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7860-3440
Kio University · JPNara Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human vestibulospinal tract has important roles in postural control, but it has been unknown whether vestibulospinal tract excitability is influenced by the body's postures. We investigated whether postures influence the vestibulospinal tract excitability by a neurophysiological method, i.e., applying galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) 100 ms before tibial nerve stimulation evoking the soleus H-reflex. GVS is a percutaneous stimulation, and it has not been clarified how the cutaneous input from GVS influences the facilitation effect of cathodal GVS on the soleus H-reflex amplitude. In Experiment 1, we evaluated the effects of GVS on the soleus H-reflex amplitude of subjects in the prone, supine, and sitting positions in random order to clarify the differences in the GVS effects among these postures. In Experiment 2, to determine whether the effects of GVS in the supine and sitting positions are due solely to cutaneous input from GVS, we provided GVS and cutaneous stimulations as conditioning stimuli and compared the effects in both postures. Interaction effects between postures and stimulus conditions were observed in both experiments. The facilitation rate of the maximum H-reflex amplitude by GVS in the sitting position was significantly higher than those in the prone and supine positions (Experiment 1). The facilitation rate of GVS was significantly larger than the cutaneous stimulation only in the sitting position (Experiment 2). These results indicate that vestibulospinal tract excitability may be higher in the sitting position than in either lying position (prone and supine), due mainly to the increased need for postural control.

Indexed as

PostureElectric StimulationH-ReflexHumansMuscle, SkeletalPostural BalanceVestibule, LabyrinthCutaneous stimulationGalvanic vestibular stimulationH-reflexPostureVestibulospinal tract

Identifiers

PMID33479869
OpenAlexW3121232062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.