Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33479811›Full record

SynthesisJournal of occupational rehabilitation2021

Job Accommodations, Return to Work and Job Retention of People with Physical Disabilities: A Systematic Review.

Jasin Wong, Natasha Kallish, Deborah Crown, Pamela Capraro, Robert Trierweiler, Q Eileen Wafford, Laurine Tiema-Benson, Shahzeb Hassan, Edeth Engel, Christina Tamayo and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Job Accommodations and Job Loss From Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  16. Employer Retention Profiles of Workers with Physical Disabilities.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jasin WongNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 633 N. Saint Clair St., 20th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. jasin.wong@northwestern.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0045-6393
Natasha KallishShirley Ryan AbilityLab, 355 E Erie St., Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Deborah CrownShirley Ryan AbilityLab, 355 E Erie St., Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Pamela CapraroShirley Ryan AbilityLab, 355 E Erie St., Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Robert TrierweilerShirley Ryan AbilityLab, 355 E Erie St., Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Q Eileen WaffordGalter Health Sciences Library and Learning Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Laurine Tiema-BensonRosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, Chicago, USA.
Shahzeb HassanNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 633 N. Saint Clair St., 20th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Edeth EngelShirley Ryan AbilityLab, 355 E Erie St., Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Christina TamayoShirley Ryan AbilityLab, 355 E Erie St., Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Allen W HeinemannNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 633 N. Saint Clair St., 20th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.

Funding

ACL HHS 90RTEM0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose We aimed to identify job accommodations that help persons with physical disabilities maintain or return to work and explore the barriers and facilitators that influence the provision and reception of job accommodations. Methods We conducted a systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019129645). The search strategy incorporated keywords describing physical disabilities, employer-approved job accommodations, and employment retention or return to work approaches. We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and ProQuest Theses and dissertations. Reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion. We used Hawker et al.'s method to assess study quality. Results We identified 2203 articles, of which 52 met inclusion criteria, developed a table of job accommodations commonly used by persons with physical disabilities, summarized the percentages of job accommodations used by persons with disabilities, synthesized evidence of the effectiveness of job accommodations, and identified the factors that influence job accommodation use. The most frequently reported accommodations were as follows: modification of job responsibilities, change of workplace policy, supportive personnel provision, flexible scheduling, and assistive technology. We summarized four types of facilitators and barriers that affect job accommodation use: employee-related factors, accommodation-related factors, job-related factors, and social workplace-related factors. Conclusion The absence of randomized controlled trials and prevalence of cross-sectional surveys provides inconclusive evidence regarding the effectiveness of specific job accommodations for people with particular functional limitations. Our system of categorizing job accommodations provides a guide to investigators seeking to evaluate the effectiveness of job accommodations using experimental methods.

Indexed as

Persons with DisabilitiesReturn to WorkCross-Sectional StudiesEmploymentHumansWorkplaceEmploymentJob accommodationPhysical disabilitiesVocational rehabilitation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.