Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33479788›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2021

Is the 0.2%-Strain-Offset Approach Appropriate for Calculating the Yield Stress of Cortical Bone?

Guanjun Zhang, Junjie Luo, Gang Zheng, Zhonghao Bai, Libo Cao, Haojie Mao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Guanjun ZhangState Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body, Hunan University, Changsha, 410082, China.
Junjie LuoState Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body, Hunan University, Changsha, 410082, China.
Gang ZhengState Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body, Hunan University, Changsha, 410082, China.
Zhonghao BaiState Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body, Hunan University, Changsha, 410082, China.
Libo CaoState Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body, Hunan University, Changsha, 410082, China.
Haojie MaoDepartment of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, Western University, London, ON, N6A 5B9, Canada. hmao8@uwo.ca.
Hunan University · CNWestern University · CA

Funding

Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 51621004Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province 2019JJ40034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 0.2% strain offset approach is mostly used to calculate the yield stress and serves as an efficient method for cross-lab comparisons of measured material properties. However, it is difficult to accurately determine the yield of the bone. Especially when computational models require accurate material parameters, clarification of the yield point is needed. We tested 24 cortical specimens harvested from six bovine femora in three-point bending mode, and 11 bovine femoral cortical specimens in the tensile mode. The Young's modulus and yield stress for each specimen derived from the specimen-specific finite element (FE) optimization method was regarded as the most ideal constitutive parameter. Then, the strain offset optimization method was used to find the strain offset closest to the ideal yield stress for the 24 specimens. The results showed that the 0 strain offsets underestimated (- 25%) the yield stress in bending and tensile tests, while the 0.2% strain offsets overestimated the yield stress (+ 65%) in three-point bending tests. Instead, the yield stress determined by 0.007 and 0.05% strain offset for bending and tensile loading respectively, can effectively characterize the biomechanical responses of the bone, thereby helping to build an accurate FE model.

Indexed as

Elastic ModulusStress, MechanicalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCattleCortical BoneFemurFinite Element AnalysisBeam theoryCortical boneDigital image correlationSpecimen-specific finite elementStrain offset approachTensileThree-point bendingYield stress

Identifiers

PMID33479788
OpenAlexW3123154471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.