Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33479726›Full record

SynthesisSchizophrenia bulletin2021

Environmental Risk Factors in Bipolar Disorder and Psychotic Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.

Victoria Rodriguez, Luis Alameda, Giulia Trotta, Edoardo Spinazzola, Paolo Marino, Sandra L Matheson, Kristin R Laurens, Robin M Murray, Evangelos Vassos

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Victoria RodriguezDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience. King's College of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0383-0846
Luis AlamedaDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience. King's College of London, London, UK.
Giulia TrottaDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience. King's College of London, London, UK.
Edoardo SpinazzolaDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience. King's College of London, London, UK.
Paolo MarinoDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience. King's College of London, London, UK.
Sandra L MathesonSchool of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Kristin R LaurensDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience. King's College of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3987-6486
Robin M MurrayDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience. King's College of London, London, UK.
Evangelos VassosSocial, Genetics and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6363-0438
King's College London · GBQueensland University of Technology · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to study the association between specific environmental risk factors (ERF) and later development of Bipolar disorder and Psychotic depression.

methodsA systematic search of prospective studies was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases, and supplemented by hand searching, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (registration number: CRD42018092253). Selected ERF included: pre-/peri-natal factors-paternal age at birth, maternal infection, obstetric complications, perinatal stress; early childhood factors-urbanicity at birth, childhood infection, childhood adversity; later life factors-substance misuse, ethnic minority and migration, urbanicity later in life, stressful life events, and traumatic head injury. Pooled effect sizes of the association between these ERF and affective psychoses were calculated from systematically selected studies. When studies examining each ERF were insufficient for meta-analysis, results were presented narratively.

resultsForty-six studies were included for quantitative analyses among selected ERF for affective psychosis, with significant association found for paternal age >40 years (OR 1.17, 95%CI 1.12-1.23), early (OR 1.52, 95%CI 1.07-2.17) and late (OR 1.32, 95%CI 1.05-1.67) gestational age, childhood adversity (OR 1.33, 95%CI 1.18-1.50), substance misuse (OR 2.87, 95%CI 1.63-5.50), and being from an ethnic minority (OR 1.99, 95%CI 1.39-2.84).

conclusionsThese results suggest some shared environmental load between non-affective and affective psychosis, implying generalized risks for psychosis rather than for specific diagnostic categories. Nonetheless, published studies for some ERF in the affective psychoses are scarce, and further longitudinal studies are needed.

Indexed as

Environmental HealthBipolar DisorderDepressionHumansProspective StudiesPsychotic DisordersRisk Factorsaffective psychosisbipolar disorderenvironmental risk factorsmeta-analysispsychotic depression

Identifiers

PMID33479726
PMCPMC8266635
OpenAlexW3027268342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.