Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33479722›Full record

SynthesisInteractive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2021

Modified ultrafiltration reduces postoperative blood loss and transfusions in adult cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Zhao Kai Low, Fei Gao, Kenny Yoong Kong Sin, Kok Hooi Yap

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. 2024 EACTS/EACTAIC Guidelines on patient blood management in adult cardiac surgery in collaboration with EBCP.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. 2024 EACTS/EACTAIC/EBCP Guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. 2024 EACTS/EACTAIC/EBCP Guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhao Kai LowDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2170-3226
Fei GaoDepartment of Biostatistics, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Kenny Yoong Kong SinDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Kok Hooi YapDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgery has been associated with several deleterious effects including haemodilution and systemic inflammation. Modified ultrafiltration (MUF) has been well established in paediatric cardiac surgery in counteracting postperfusion syndrome. However, MUF is less commonly used in adult cardiac surgery. In this meta-analysis, we compared clinical outcomes in adult patients who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass with and without MUF.

methodsElectronic searches were performed using Pubmed, Ovid Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library until April 2020. Selection criteria were randomized studies of adult cardiac surgery patients comparing MUF versus no MUF. Primary outcomes were postoperative mortality, haematocrit, blood transfusion, chest tube drainage, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and duration of mechanical ventilation.

resultsThirteen randomized controlled trials were included, comprising 626 patients in the MUF group, and 610 patients in the control (no-MUF) group. There was a significantly improved postoperative haematocrit [mean difference 2.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-4.73, P = 0.009], lower chest tube drainage (mean difference -105 ml, 95% CI -202 to -7 ml, P = 0.032), lower postoperative blood transfusion rate (mean difference -0.73 units, 95% CI -0.98 to -0.47 units, P < 0.0001) and shorter duration of ICU stay (mean difference -0.13 days, 95% CI -0.27 to -0.00 days, P = 0.048) in the MUF group. There was no difference in ventilation time (mean difference -0.47 h, 95% CI -2.05 to 1.12 h, P = 0.56) or mortality rates (odds ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.28-1.33, P = 0.22). There were no reported complications associated with MUF.

conclusionsMUF is a safe and feasible option in adult cardiac patients, with significant benefits including improved postoperative haematocrit, as well as reduced postoperative chest tube bleeding, transfusion requirements and duration of ICU stay.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresHemofiltrationPostoperative HemorrhageAdultBlood TransfusionCardiopulmonary BypassHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUltrafiltrationAdult cardiac surgeryBlood transfusionsCardiopulmonary bypassClinical outcomesConventional ultrafiltrationHaematocritMeta-analysisModified ultrafiltration

Identifiers

PMID33479722
PMCPMC8691561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.