ArticleRSC medicinal chemistry2020
Active learning effectively identifies a minimal set of maximally informative and asymptotically performant cytotoxic structure-activity patterns in NCI-60 cell lines.
Article in RSC medicinal chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving Generalizability in Whole-Cell Antibiotic Discovery Through Active Learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Advancing genetic engineering with active learning: theory, implementations and potential opportunities.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- UMAP-based clustering split for rigorous evaluation of AI models for virtual screening on cancer cell lines.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The NCI-60 cancer cell line screening panel has provided insights for development of subtype-specific chemical therapies and repurposing. By extracting chemical structure and cytotoxicity patterns, virtual screening potentially complements the availability of high-throughput assay platforms and improves bioactive compound discovery rates by computational prefiltering of candidate compound libraries. Many groups report high prediction performances in computational models of NCI-60 data when using cross-validation or similar techniques, yet prospective therapy development in novel cancers may have little to no such data and further may not have the resources to perform hit identification using large compound libraries. In contrast to bulk screening and analysis, the active learning methodology has demonstrated how to identify compounds for screening in small batches and update computational models iteratively, leading to predictive models with a minimum number of compounds, and importantly clarifying data volumes at which limits in predictive ability are achieved. Here, in replicate per-cell line experiments using 50% of data (∼20 000 compounds) as the external prediction target, predictive limits are reproducibly demonstrated at the stage of systematic selection of 10-30% of the incorporable half. The pattern was consistent across all 60 cell lines. Limits of predictability are found to be correlated to the doubling times of cell lines and the number of cellular response discontinuities (activity cliffs) present per cell line. Organization into chemical scaffolds delineated degrees of predictive challenge. These results provide key insights for strategies in developing new inhibitors in existing cell lines or for future automated therapy selection in personalized oncotherapy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.