Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33479673›Full record

ReviewRSC medicinal chemistry2020

KRasG12C inhibitors in clinical trials: a short historical perspective.

Lisa Goebel, Matthias P Müller, Roger S Goody, Daniel Rauh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC medicinal chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Targeting KRASScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  7. Adagrasib in the treatment of colorectal cancer.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Targeting KRAS in Colorectal Cancer: A Bench to Bedside Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Covalent inhibitor targets KRasGenes & diseases · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lisa GoebelFaculty of Chemistry and Chemical Biology , TU Dortmund University , Otto-Hahn-Strasse 4a , 44227 Dortmund , Germany . Email: daniel.rauh@tu-dortmund.de.
Matthias P MüllerFaculty of Chemistry and Chemical Biology , TU Dortmund University , Otto-Hahn-Strasse 4a , 44227 Dortmund , Germany . Email: daniel.rauh@tu-dortmund.de.ORCID 0000-0002-1529-8933
Roger S GoodyDepartment of Structural Biochemistry , Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology , Otto-Hahn-Strasse 11 , 44227 Dortmund , Germany.
Daniel RauhFaculty of Chemistry and Chemical Biology , TU Dortmund University , Otto-Hahn-Strasse 4a , 44227 Dortmund , Germany . Email: daniel.rauh@tu-dortmund.de.ORCID 0000-0002-1970-7642

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

KRas is the most frequently mutated oncogene in human cancer, and even 40 years after the initial discovery of Ras oncogenes in 1982, no approved drug directly targets Ras in Ras-driven cancer. New information and approaches for direct targeting of mutant Ras have fueled hope for the development of direct KRas inhibitors. In this review, we provide a comprehensive historical perspective of the development of promising KRasG12C inhibitors that covalently bind to the mutated cysteine residue in the switch-II pocket and trap the protein in the inactive GDP bound state. After decades of failure, three covalent G12C-specific inhibitors from three independent companies have recently entered clinical trials and therefore represent new hope for patients suffering from KRasG12C driven cancer.

Identifiers

PMID33479673
PMCPMC7549139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.