Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33479515›Full record

ArticleBritish dental journal2021

The effect of SARS-CoV-2 on the prescribing of antimicrobials and analgesics by NHS general dental practitioners in England.

Nikolaus O A Palmer, Noha Seoudi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British dental journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dentist Related Factors Associated with Implementation of COVID-19 Protective Measures: A National Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nikolaus O A PalmerGeneral Dental Practitioner, Honorary Lecturer, University of Liverpool, UK. nikolaus.palmer@btinternet.com.
Noha SeoudiSenior Clinical Lecturer in Oral Microbiology, Centre for Oral Immunobiology and Regenerative Medicine, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 2AD, UK.
Queen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims To ascertain the effect of SARS-CoV-2 on the utilisation of antibacterial agents and analgesics in primary dental care.Methods Antibacterial agents and analgesics (eg paracetamol, aspirin) prescribed in England by general dental practitioners for the periods April-July 2019 and April-July 2020 were analysed.Results Antibacterial agents prescribed during COVID-19 restrictions in 2020 (799,282) were higher than a similar time period in 2019 (654,332) by 22%. Amoxicillin was used the most (2020 = 65.0%; 2019 = 66.3%) followed by metronidazole (2020 = 30.2%; 2019 = 28.7%). Erythromycin was prescribed at a similar rate, with lincosamides (clindamycin) prescribed more frequently in 2020 (2020 = 0.6%; 2019 = 0.5%). Clarithromycin was prescribed twice more often in 2020 (0.6%) in comparison to 2019 (0.3%). Co-amoxiclav (0.5%) and phenoxymethylpenicillin (0.3%) were prescribed at a similar rate. Analgesics use increased by 84% (2020 = 28,563; 2019 = 15,507). Use of dihydrocodeine tartrate increased (2020 = 40.9%; 2019 = 32.9%), followed by diclofenac sodium (2020 = 24.6%; 2019 = 12.8%). The opposite trend was seen in relation to ibuprofen with use decreasing (2020 = 19.4%; 2019 = 39.8%) while paracetamol use only slightly increasing (2020 = 15.1%; 2019 = 14.6%).Conclusions COVID-19 restrictions on dental care in England resulted in a marked increase in prescribing antibacterial agents and a very marked increase in prescription-only analgesics.

Identifiers

PMID33479515
PMCPMC7819619
OpenAlexW3121284678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.