ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2021
Clinical significance of quantitative categorization of HER2 fluorescent in situ hybridization results in invasive breast cancer patients treated with HER2-targeted agents.
Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Response to anti-HER2 neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive invasive breast cancers with different HER2 FISH patterns.Journal of clinical pathology · 2025Article
- Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Invasive Breast Cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0: Risk Classification and Molecular Typing by a 21-Gene Expression Assay and MammaPrint Plus BluePrint Testing.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
HER2 (ERBB2) gene status serves as a strong predictive marker of response to HER2-targeted agents in invasive breast cancers, albeit with heterogeneous response. Our aim was to determine the distribution and prognosis of HER2 groups by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) using the updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology-College of American Pathologist (ASCO-CAP) guidelines. We identified 226 cases of equivocal or positive HER2 FISH invasive breast cancer (interpreted by ASCO-CAP guidelines at the time of reporting) who received HER2-targeted agents from 2006 to 2017. We subcategorized Group 1 further into three subgroups: low amplified (HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥ 2.0-2.99, mean HER2/cell 4.0-5.9), amplified (HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥ 2.0-2.99, mean HER2/cell ≥ 6), and excessive amplification (HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥ 3.0, mean HER2/cell ≥ 4.0). Outcomes studied were recurrence, metastasis, second breast primary, disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS). Univariate analysis showed that the five categories of HER2 FISH were significantly associated with OS (p < 0.01), specifically higher HER2 amplification was associated with fewer deaths. HER2 FISH status also statistically significantly relates to DFS (p < 0.01) and metastasis (p = 0.01) but not with recurrence or second breast primary in our study. Tumor type and HER2 ISH Groups are independent predictors for both OS and DFS in our cohort. The proposed Group 1 subcategories were significantly associated with OS (p < 0.01) and DFS (p < 0.01), excessive HER2 amplification was associated with longer median survival. The Cox regression models showed better survival outcomes for the excessive amplification subgroup than the low amplified subgroup, with OS (hazard ratio = 0.63, 95% CI 0.42-0.93) and DFS (HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.37-0.83). We demonstrated that in HER2 FISH Group 1 patients, high HER2 amplification was significantly associated with longer OS and DFS; these patients seem to benefit more from HER2-targeted regimens. We recommend reporting these Group 1 subcategories when assessing HER2 FISH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.