Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33479374›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Adding a toe joint to a prosthesis: walking biomechanics, energetics, and preference of individuals with unilateral below-knee limb loss.

Kirsty A McDonald, Rachel H Teater, Justin P Cruz, John T Kerr, Gerasimos Bastas, Karl E Zelik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Motion Analysis of a Frontal Plane Adaptable Prosthetic Foot.Journal of prosthetics and orthotics : JPO · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kirsty A McDonaldDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA. kirsty.mcdonald@unsw.edu.au.
Rachel H TeaterDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.
Justin P CruzDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.
John T KerrDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.
Gerasimos BastasDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.
Karl E ZelikDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

Training Program for Innovative Engineering Research in Surgery and InterventionT32EB021937 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Dario J Englot, Michael Ian Miga · 2016 to 2026
$2.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB021937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toe joints play an important functional role in able-bodied walking; however, for prosthesis users, the effect of adding a toe joint to a passive prosthetic foot remains largely unknown. The current study explores the kinematics, kinetics, rate of oxygen consumption and user preference of nine individuals with below-knee limb loss. Participants walked on a passive prosthetic foot in two configurations: with a Flexible, articulating toe joint and with a Locked-out toe joint. During level treadmill gait, participants exhibited a decrease in Push-Off work when using the Flexible toe joint prosthesis versus the Locked toe joint prosthesis: 16% less from the prosthesis (p = 0.004) and 10% less at the center of mass level (p = 0.039). However, between configurations, participants exhibited little change in other gait kinematics or kinetics, and no apparent or consistent difference in the rate of oxygen consumption (p = 0.097). None of the traditional biomechanical or metabolic outcomes seemed to explain user preference. However, an unexpected and intriguing observation was that all participants who wore the prosthesis on their dominant limb preferred the Flexible toe joint, and every other participant preferred the Locked configuration. Although perhaps coincidental, such findings may suggest a potential link between user preference and limb dominance, offering an interesting avenue for future research.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsJoint ProsthesisAdultAmputeesAnkleBiomechanical PhenomenaFootHumansKneeKnee JointMaleMusculoskeletal SystemProsthesis DesignRoboticsToe JointWalking

Identifiers

PMID33479374
PMCPMC7820350
OpenAlexW3125986995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.