Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33479301›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Ex vivo culture of intact human patient derived pancreatic tumour tissue.

John Kokkinos, George Sharbeen, Koroush S Haghighi, Rosa Mistica C Ignacio, Chantal Kopecky, Estrella Gonzales-Aloy, Janet Youkhana, Paul Timpson, Brooke A Pereira, Shona Ritchie and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. New developments and applications of human organoids.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Selective epithelial expression of KRASScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Harnessing Organoid Platforms for Nanoparticle Drug Development.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. 3D Culture Analysis of Cancer Cell Adherence toTissue engineering. Part C, Methods · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

John KokkinosPancreatic Cancer Translational Research Group, School of Medical Sciences, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
George SharbeenPancreatic Cancer Translational Research Group, School of Medical Sciences, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Koroush S HaghighiPrince of Wales Hospital, Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Rosa Mistica C IgnacioPancreatic Cancer Translational Research Group, School of Medical Sciences, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Chantal KopeckyPancreatic Cancer Translational Research Group, School of Medical Sciences, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Estrella Gonzales-AloyPancreatic Cancer Translational Research Group, School of Medical Sciences, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Janet YoukhanaPancreatic Cancer Translational Research Group, School of Medical Sciences, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Paul TimpsonCancer Theme, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Brooke A PereiraCancer Theme, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Shona RitchieCancer Theme, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Elvis PandzicBiomedical Imaging Facility, Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Cyrille BoyerAustralian Centre for Nanomedicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Thomas P DavisARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio-Nano Science and Technology and Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Lisa M ButlerAdelaide Medical School and Freemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
David GoldsteinPancreatic Cancer Translational Research Group, School of Medical Sciences, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Joshua A McCarrollAustralian Centre for Nanomedicine, ARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio-Nano Science and Technology, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Phoebe A PhillipsPancreatic Cancer Translational Research Group, School of Medical Sciences, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. p.phillips@unsw.edu.au.
UNSW Sydney · AUPrince of Wales Hospital · AUCancer Institute of New South Wales · AUGarvan Institute of Medical Research · AUMonash University · AUThe Kinghorn Cancer Centre · AUUniversity of Adelaide · AU

Funding

Avner Pancreatic Cancer Foundation Innovation Grant APCF0050618Beat Cancer Project Principal Cancer Research Fellowship PRF1117Cancer Australia APP1126736Cancer-Institute NSW ECF/CDF CDF181166Cancer Institute NSW 'The Professor Rob Sutherland AO Make a Difference Award' 2017/AWD002NHMRC project grant APP1144108NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship APP1136974Tour de Cure PhD Support Scholarship RSP-011-18/19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The poor prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is attributed to the highly fibrotic stroma and complex multi-cellular microenvironment that is difficult to fully recapitulate in pre-clinical models. To fast-track translation of therapies and to inform personalised medicine, we aimed to develop a whole-tissue ex vivo explant model that maintains viability, 3D multicellular architecture, and microenvironmental cues of human pancreatic tumours. Patient-derived surgically-resected PDAC tissue was cut into 1-2 mm explants and cultured on gelatin sponges for 12 days. Immunohistochemistry revealed that human PDAC explants were viable for 12 days and maintained their original tumour, stromal and extracellular matrix architecture. As proof-of-principle, human PDAC explants were treated with Abraxane and we observed different levels of response between patients. PDAC explants were also transfected with polymeric nanoparticles + Cy5-siRNA and we observed abundant cytoplasmic distribution of Cy5-siRNA throughout the PDAC explants. Overall, our novel model retains the 3D architecture of human PDAC and has advantages over standard organoids: presence of functional multi-cellular stroma and fibrosis, and no tissue manipulation, digestion, or artificial propagation of organoids. This provides unprecedented opportunity to study PDAC biology including tumour-stromal interactions and rapidly assess therapeutic response to drive personalised treatment.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesAdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCell Line, TumorExtracellular MatrixHumansOrganoidsPancreasTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID33479301
PMCPMC7820421
OpenAlexW3123429969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.