Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33479291›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Corneal confocal microscopy identifies small fibre damage and progression of diabetic neuropathy.

Shaishav Dhage, Maryam Ferdousi, Safwaan Adam, Jan Hoong Ho, Alise Kalteniece, Shazli Azmi, Uazman Alam, Georgios Ponirakis, Ioannis Petropoulos, Andrew J Atkinson and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Quantifying the Corneal Nerve Whorl Pattern.Translational vision science & technology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Shaishav DhageDepartment of Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Maryam FerdousiCardiovascular Research Group, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Safwaan AdamDepartment of Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Jan Hoong HoDepartment of Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Alise KaltenieceCardiovascular Research Group, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Shazli AzmiDepartment of Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Uazman AlamInstitute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and The Pain Research Institute, University of Liverpool & Liverpool University NHS Hospital Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Georgios PonirakisDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Qatar Foundation, Education City, Doha, Qatar.
Ioannis PetropoulosDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Qatar Foundation, Education City, Doha, Qatar.
Andrew J AtkinsonCardiovascular Research Group, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Andrew MarshallInstitute of Life Course and Medical Sciences and The Pain Research Institute, University of Liverpool & Liverpool University NHS Hospital Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Maria JeziorskaCardiovascular Research Group, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Handrean SoranDepartment of Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Rayaz A MalikDepartment of Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. ram2045@qatar-med.cornell.edu.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately quantifying the progression of diabetic peripheral neuropathy is key to identify individuals who will progress to foot ulceration and to power clinical intervention trials. We have undertaken detailed neuropathy phenotyping to assess the longitudinal utility of different measures of neuropathy in patients with diabetes. Nineteen patients with diabetes (age 52.5 ± 14.7 years, duration of diabetes 26.0 ± 13.8 years) and 19 healthy controls underwent assessment of symptoms and signs of neuropathy, quantitative sensory testing, autonomic nerve function, neurophysiology, intra-epidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD) and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) to quantify corneal nerve fibre density (CNFD), branch density (CNBD) and fibre length (CNFL). Mean follow-up was 6.5 years. Glycated haemoglobin (p = 0.04), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) (p = 0.0009) and urinary albumin creatinine ratio (p < 0.0001) improved. Neuropathy symptom profile (p = 0.03), neuropathy disability score (p = 0.04), vibration perception threshold (p = 0.02), cold perception threshold (p = 0.006), CNFD (p = 0.03), CNBD (p < 0.0001), CNFL (p < 0.0001), IENFD (p = 0.04), sural (p = 0.02) and peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity (p = 0.03) deteriorated significantly. Change (∆) in CNFL correlated with ∆CPT (p = 0.006) and ∆Expiration/Inspiration ratio (p = 0.002) and ∆IENFD correlated with ∆CNFD (p = 0.005), ∆CNBD (p = 0.02) and ∆CNFL (p = 0.01). This study shows worsening of diabetic neuropathy across a range of neuropathy measures, especially CCM, despite an improvement in HbA1c and LDL-C. It further supports the utility of CCM as a rapid, non-invasive surrogate measure of diabetic neuropathy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceBody Mass IndexCholesterol, LDLCorneaDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NeuropathiesDisease ProgressionGlycated HemoglobinHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalMiddle AgedNerve FibersCholesterol, LDLGlycated Hemoglobin

Identifiers

PMID33479291
PMCPMC7820596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.