Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33479223›Full record

ArticleBDJ open2021

How effective and cost-effective is water fluoridation for adults? Protocol for a 10-year retrospective cohort study.

Deborah Moore, Thomas Allen, Stephen Birch, Martin Tickle, Tanya Walsh, Iain A Pretty

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BDJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Deborah MooreDental Public Health, Division of Dentistry, Dental Health Unit, The University of Manchester, Lloyd Street North Manchester Science Park, Manchester, M15 6SE, UK. deborah.moore-2@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9965-9371
Thomas AllenDirector, Centre for the Business and Economics of Health, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, 4072, UK.
Stephen BirchDirector, Centre for the Business and Economics of Health, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, 4072, UK.
Martin TickleDental Public Health & Primary Care, Division of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Coupland 3, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Tanya WalshHealthcare Evaluation, Division of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Coupland 3, Manchester, M139PL, UK.
Iain A PrettyPublic Health Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Dental Health Unit, The University of Manchester, Lloyd Street North Manchester Science Park, Manchester, M15 6SE, UK.
University Dental Hospital of Manchester · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

DH | NIHR | Public Health Research Programme (NIHR Public Health Research Programme) 128533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTooth decay can cause pain, sleepless nights and loss of productive workdays. Fluoridation of drinking water was identified in the 1940s as a cost-effective method of prevention. In the mid-1970s, fluoride toothpastes became widely available. Since then, in high-income countries the prevalence of tooth decay in children has reduced whilst natural tooth retention in older age groups has increased. Most water fluoridation research was carried out before these dramatic changes in fluoride availability and oral health. Furthermore, there is a paucity of evidence in adults. The aim of this study is to assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of water fluoridation in preventing invasive dental treatment in adults and adolescents aged over 12. METHODS/

designRetrospective cohort study using 10 years of routinely available dental treatment data. Individuals exposed to water fluoridation will be identified by sampled water fluoride concentration linked to place of residence. Outcomes will be based on the number of invasive dental treatments received per participant (fillings, extractions, root canal treatments). A generalised linear model with clustering by local authority area will be used for analysis. The model will include area level propensity scores and individual-level covariates. The economic evaluation will focus on (1) cost-effectiveness as assessed by the water fluoridation mean cost per invasive treatment avoided and (2) a return on investment from the public sector perspective, capturing the change in cost of dental service utilisation resulting from investment in water fluoridation. DISCUSSIONS: There is a well-recognised need for contemporary evidence regarding the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of water fluoridation, particularly for adults. The absence of such evidence for all age groups may lead to an underestimation of the potential benefits of a population-wide, rather than targeted, fluoride delivery programme. This study will utilise a pragmatic design to address the information needs of policy makers in a timely manner.

Identifiers

PMID33479223
PMCPMC7820470
OpenAlexW3125963374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.