ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2021
Potential to reduce antibiotic use in secondary care: Single-centre process audit of prescription duration using NICE guidance for common infections.
Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hospital Clinicians' Knowledge of and Opportunity and Motivation for Prescribing Short Antibiotic Courses for Common Infections.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Duration of Antimicrobial Treatment in Adult Patients with Pneumonia: A Narrative Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Accordance of Registered Drug Packages with Guideline-Recommended Treatment Durations for Community-Acquired Pneumonia-A New Antibiotic Stewardship Target?Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Identification of Intervention Opportunities through Assessment of the Appropriateness of Antibiotic Prescribing in Surgical Patients in a UK Hospital Using a National Audit Tool: A Single Centre Retrospective Audit.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Implementation of the Antimicrobial Review Kit (ARK) to optimise antimicrobial prescribing at the Royal Cornwall Hospital: a behavioural change odyssey.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAntibiotic use drives antibiotic resistance. Reducing antibiotic use through reducing antibiotic course lengths could contribute to the UK national ambition to reduce total antibiotic use.
methodsMedical notes were reviewed for patients who had received at least 5 days of antibiotic therapy; had been discharged in January 2019; and were from a 750-bed acute secondary care hospital in England. UK national guidelines were used to determine the excess antibiotic use in common medical infections: community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), pyelonephritis, cellulitis, infective exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (IECOPD) and cholangitis.
resultsFour-hundred and twenty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 307 (73%) patient notes were retrieved and reviewed. One-hundred and seventy-three patients met the study case definitions, of which, 137 met short course criteria.Potential antibiotic reductions (measured in defined daily doses) were identified for five of the six infections: 32% in CAP, 20% in HAP, 14% in IECOPD, 11% in cellulitis and 10% in pyelonephritis. These reductions were estimated to reduce total antibiotic use in medical specialties by 12.4%, which equates to 3.6% of the hospital's total antibiotic use.
conclusionClinical application of the evidence-based guidance for shorter antibiotic course lengths appears to be a valid strategy for reducing total antibiotic consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.