ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2021
Review of hygiene adaptations among UK doctors in controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of COVID-19 disinfection recommendations on microbial environment contamination: focus on emergency physicians' stethoscopes and smartphones.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA significant number of healthcare workers around the world have contracted COVID-19 from their workplace, thus there is a need to investigate common hygiene practices.
aimWe aimed to describe the common hygiene adaptations of doctors in the hospital and at home.
methodsA survey of 110 doctors in UK was carried out to determine their hygiene adaptations and practices. Data were collected on demographics and personal protective equipment compliance.
resultsThe key findings were frequent hand washing (51%), change of clothing entering and leaving hospital (88% and 92%, respectively), taking a shower upon returning home (85%) and washing work attire at temperatures of 60-80°C (50%). A higher proportion of junior doctors washed their scrubs (p=0.004) and stethoscopes (p=0.014) compared with consultants and seniors. Female doctors cleaned their mobile phones (p=0.022) and work belongings (p=0.01) more frequently.
conclusionThis study signified that junior doctors were more meticulous in hygiene adaptations and female doctors were more fastidious in personal hygiene. The observations of this study may be beneficial in preventing transmission of infection to families of healthcare professionals and are important to implement in the case of a second wave of COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.