ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2021
Cui bono? PEG feeding.
Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) provides long-term nutritional support to those unable to tolerate intake orally. The benefits of a PEG depend on the indication and the individual, and are considered when it has the potential to improve mortality, nutritional status or quality of life. Often, family members and healthcare professionals have to act on behalf of the patient. It is difficult for their personal values and emotions to not be a factor when deciding if to proceed with a PEG. This may result in unnecessary PEG placement. For certain indications (dementia for example), there is limited evidence of any benefits a PEG may give and may actually cause harm. Guidance to improve patient selection and increase education for healthcare professionals is essential in achieving the best outcome for the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.