Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33479025›Full record

Trial reportJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2021

Trial to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of a melanoma helper peptide vaccine plus incomplete Freund's adjuvant, cyclophosphamide, and polyICLC (Mel63).

Craig L Slingluff, Gina R Petroni, Kimberly A Chianese-Bullock, Nolan A Wages, Walter C Olson, Kelly T Smith, Kathleen Haden, Lynn T Dengel, Anna Dickinson, Caroline Reed and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cancer stem cell antigen nanodisc cocktail elicits anti-tumor immune responses in melanoma.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. A nano-enhanced vaccine for metastatic melanoma immunotherapy.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Craig L SlingluffDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA cls8h@virginia.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6664-4373
Gina R PetroniUniversity of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Kimberly A Chianese-BullockDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Nolan A WagesUniversity of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Walter C OlsonDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Kelly T SmithOffice of Research Cores Administration, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Kathleen HadenUniversity of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Lynn T DengelDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Anna DickinsonDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Caroline ReedDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Elizabeth M GaughanMedicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
William W GroshMedicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Varinder KaurMedicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Nikole VarhegyiPublic Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Mark SmolkinPublic Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Nadejda V GaleassiCardiovascular Imaging Center, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Donna DeaconDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Emily H HallDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
University of Virginia · USUniversity of Virginia Cancer CenterEmory University · USImaging Center · US

Funding

Women's Oncology Program - WONP30CA044579 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Jay William FOX · 1987 to 2026
$72.1M
MELANOMA VACCINE FOR HELPER T CELLS COMBINED WITH TARGETED OR IMMUNE THERAPIESR01CA178846 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI SLINGLUFF, CRAIG LEE · 2015 to 2017
$1.2M
Phase I Designs for Combined Immunotherapies in CancerK25CA181638 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI WAGES, NOLAN · 2014 to 2018
$780k
Antibodies to melanoma vaccine peptidesR03CA219715 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI SLINGLUFF, CRAIG LEE · 2017 to 2018
$161k
NCI NIH HHS K25 CA181638NCI NIH HHS P30 CA044579NCI NIH HHS R01 CA178846NCI NIH HHS R03 CA219715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeptide vaccines designed to stimulate melanoma-reactive CD4 PARTICIPANTS AND

methodsAn adaptive design based on toxicity and durable CD4+ T cell immune response (dRsp) was used to assign participants with resected stage IIA-IV melanoma to one of four study regimens. The regimens included a vaccine comprising six melanoma peptides restricted by Class II MHC (6MHP) in an emulsion with IFA alone (Arm A), with IFA plus systemic mCy (Arm B), with IFA+ local polyICLC (Arm C), or with IFA+ polyICLC+ mCy (Arm D). Toxicities were recorded (CTCAE V.4.03). T cell responses were measured by interferon γ ELIspot assay ex vivo. Serum Ab responses to 6MHP were measured by ELISA. Circulating T-regs were assessed by flow cytometry.

resultsForty-eight eligible participants were enrolled and treated. Early data on safety and dRsp favored enrollment on arm D. Total enrollment on Arms A-D were 3, 7, 6, and 32, respectively. Treatment-related dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in 1/7 (14%) participants on arm B and 2/32 (6%) on arm D. None exceeded the 25% DLT threshold for early closure to enrollment for any arm. Strong durable T cell responses to 6MHP were detected ex vivo in 0%, 29%, 67%, and 47% of participants on arms A-D, respectively. IgG Ab responses were greatest for arms C and D. Circulating T-regs frequencies were not altered by mCy.

conclusions6MHP vaccines administered with IFA, polyICLC, and mCy were well tolerated. The dRsp rate for arm D of 47% (90% CI 32 to 63) exceeded the 18% (90% CI 11 to 26) rate previously observed with 6MHP in IFA alone. Vaccination with IFA+ polyICLC (arm C) also showed promise for enhancing T cell and Ab responses.

Indexed as

Administration, MetronomicAdministration, OralAntibodiesCancer VaccinesCarboxymethylcellulose SodiumCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCombined Modality TherapyCyclophosphamideFemaleFreund's AdjuvantHumansLipidsMaleMelanomaNeoplasm StagingPoly I-CAntibodiesCancer VaccinesCarboxymethylcellulose SodiumCyclophosphamideFreund's Adjuvantincomplete Freund's adjuvantLipidsPoly I-Cpoly ICLCPolylysineVaccines, Subunitadjuvantsantibody formationCD4-positive T-lymphocytesimmunogenicityimmunologicmelanomavaccine

Identifiers

PMID33479025
PMCPMC7825263
OpenAlexW3123732980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.