ArticleClinical epigenetics2021
Evaluation of a panel of tumor-specific differentially-methylated DNA regions in IRF4, IKZF1 and BCAT1 for blood-based detection of colorectal cancer.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic value of genetic and epigenetic biomarker panels for colorectal cancer detection: a systematic review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Pooled it
- A scoping review of DNA methylation biomarkers for non-invasive detection of colorectal cancer at the CpG site level.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Article
- ZNF33A activates Wnt/β-catenin signaling and promotes BCAA catabolism in colorectal cancer.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Article
- A targeted DNA methylation method for detecting gastrointestinal cancer in circulating cell-free DNA.iScience · 2026Article
- Improved circulating tumor DNA profiling by simultaneous extraction of DNA methylation and copy number information from methylated DNA sequencing data.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- [Performance of Plasma Multigene Methylation Testing in Early Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025Article
- RECAP-seq: restriction enzyme-based CpG-methylated fragment amplification for early cancer detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comprehensive evaluation and progress of colorectal cancer screening methods.Gut pathogens · 2025Review
- The Role of Epigenetic Biomarkers as Diagnostic, Predictive and Prognostic Factors in Colorectal Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- Whole-genome sequencing of cell-free DNA reveals DNA of tumor origin in plasma from patients with colorectal adenomas.Molecular oncology · 2025Article
- A dual-gene panel of two fragments of methylated IRF4 and one of ZEB2 in plasma cell-free DNA for gastric cancer detection.Epigenetics · 2024Article
- Circulating tumour DNA and risk of recurrence in patients with asymptomatic versus symptomatic colorectal cancer.British journal of cancer · 2024Article
- Clinical diagnostic value of methylated SEPT9 combined with NLR, PLR and LMR in colorectal cancer.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Quantification method of ctDNA using cell-free DNA methylation profile for noninvasive screening and monitoring of colon cancer.Clinical epigenetics · 2024Article
- Identify BCAT1 plays an oncogenic role and promotes EMT in KIRC via single cell RNA-seq and experiment.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Detecting colorectal cancer using genetic and epigenetic biomarkers: screening and diagnosis.Journal of medicine and life · 2024Review
- Evaluating the Role of Methylated Circulating Tumor DNA in Combination With Pathological Prognostic Factors for Predicting Recurrence of Colorectal Cancer.Biomarker insights · 2024Article
- Genomic and Transcriptomic Research in the Discovery and Application of Colorectal Cancer Circulating Markers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Plasma cell-free DNA methylome profiling in pre- and post-surgery oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.Molecular carcinogenesis · 2023Article
- Using Circulating Tumor DNA as a Novel Biomarker to Screen and Diagnose Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDifferentially-methylated regions (DMRs) are characteristic of colorectal cancer (CRC) and some occur more frequently than common mutations. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of assaying circulating cell-free DNA for methylation in BCAT1, IKZF1 and IRF4 for detection of CRC.
methodsA multiplexed real-time PCR assay targeting DMRs in each of the three genes was developed. Assay accuracy was explored in plasma specimens banked from observational cross-sectional trials or from volunteers scheduled for colonoscopy or prior to CRC surgery.
results1620 specimens were suitable for study inclusion including 184 and 616 cases with CRC and adenomas, respectively, and 820 cases without neoplasia (overall median age, 63.0 years; 56% males). Combining the PCR signals for all targeted DMRs returned the best sensitivity for CRC (136/184, 73.9%, 95% CI 67.1-79.7), advanced adenomas (53/337, 15.7%, 95% CI 12.0-20.1) and high-grade dysplastic (HGD) adenomas (9/35, 25.7%, 95% CI 14.0-42.3) with a 90.1%, specificity for neoplasia (739/820, 95% CI 87.9-92.0, p < 0.01). Detection of methylation in all three genes were more likely in CRC cases than those without it (OR 28.5, 95% CI 7.3-121.2, p < 0.0001). Of the 81 positive cases without neoplasia, 62 (76.5%) were positive by a single PCR replicate only and predominantly due to detection of methylated BCAT1 (53.2%). Single replicate positivity was significantly higher than that in CRC (26/136, 19.1%, p < 0.0001), and single BCAT1 replicate positivity was more likely in cases without neoplasia than in CRC (OR 17.7, 95% CI 6.6-43.3, p < 0.0001). When a positive result was limited to those with ≥ 1 PCR replicate positive for either IKZF1 or IRF4, or at least two replicates positive for BCAT1, the multi-panel test maintained a high sensitivity for CRC (131/184, 71.2%, 95% CI 64.3-77.3) and HGD adenomas (8/35, 22.9%, 95% CI 11.8-39.3, p = 0.029) but improved specificity significantly (772/820, 94.1%, 95% CI 92.3-95.6, p < 0.0001 vs. any PCR replicate positive).
conclusionThe multi-panel methylation assay differentiates cases with CRC from those without it and does so with high specificity when criteria for BCAT1 detection are applied. The marker panel is flexible and studies in those at average risk for CRC are now warranted to determine which panel configuration best suits screening goals.
trial registrationACTRN12611000318987. Registered 25 March 2011, https://www.anzctr.org.au/ ACTRN12611000318987.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.