Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33478556›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2021

Standardizing fatigue-resistance testing during electrical stimulation of paralysed human quadriceps muscles, a practical approach.

Martin Schmoll, Ronan Le Guillou, David Lobato Borges, Charles Fattal, Emerson Fachin-Martins, Christine Azevedo Coste

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Martin SchmollINRIA - LIRMM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France. martin.schmoll@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0001-6354-3879
Ronan Le GuillouINRIA - LIRMM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8236-8583
David Lobato BorgesNTAAI, Faculdade de Ceilândia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6769-5359
Charles FattalCRF La Châtaigneraie, Menucourt, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3042-0941
Emerson Fachin-MartinsNTAAI, Faculdade de Ceilândia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9858-9009
Christine Azevedo CosteINRIA - LIRMM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7379-8004
Université de Montpellier · FRUniversidade de Brasília · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRapid onset of muscular fatigue is still one of the main issues of functional electrical stimulation (FES). A promising technique, known as distributed stimulation, aims to activate sub-units of a muscle at a lower stimulation frequency to increase fatigue-resistance. Besides a general agreement on the beneficial effects, the great heterogeneity of evaluation techniques, raises the demand for a standardized method to better reflect the requirements of a practical application.

methodsThis study investigated the fatigue-development of 6 paralysed quadriceps muscles over the course of 180 dynamic contractions, evaluating different electrode-configurations (conventional and distributed stimulation). For a standardized comparison, fatigue-testing was performed at 40% of the peak-torque during a maximal evoked contraction (MEC). Further, we assessed the isometric torque for each electrode-configuration at different knee-extension-angles (70°-170°, 10° steps).

resultsOur results showed no significant difference in the fatigue-index for any of the tested electrode-configurations, compared to conventional-stimulation. We conjecture that the positive effects of distributed stimulation become less pronounced at higher stimulation amplitudes. The isometric torque produced at different knee-extension angles was similar for most electrode-configurations. Maximal torque-production was found at 130°-140° knee-extension-angle, which correlates with the maximal knee-flexion-angles during running.

conclusionIn most practical applications, FES is intended to initiate dynamic movements. Therefore, it is crucial to assess fatigue-resistance by using dynamic contractions. Reporting the relationship between produced torque and knee-extension-angle can help to observe the stability of a chosen electrode-configuration for a targeted range-of-motion. Additionally, we suggest to perform fatigue testing at higher forces (e.g. 40% of the maximal evoked torque) in pre-trained subjects with SCI to better reflect the practical demands of FES-applications.

Indexed as

AdultElectric Stimulation TherapyElectrodesHumansIsometric ContractionMaleMuscle FatigueParalysisQuadriceps MuscleSpinal Cord InjuriesDistributed stimulationDynamic movementFatigue testingFunctional electrical stimulationKnee dynamometerSpinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID33478556
PMCPMC7818559
OpenAlexW3125704421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.