Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33478548›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2021

Comparison of physical effect between two training methods for individuals with substance use disorder.

Yang Yan-Guang, Chen Jing-Yi, Pang Xiao-Wu, Shen Meng-Lu, Yang Su-Yong, Xu Ding, Xiao Ke, Wang Tian-Yuan, Wang Jia-Bin, Zhu Dong

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yang Yan-GuangWushu College, Shanghai University of Sport, 200438, Shanghai, China.
Chen Jing-YiWushu College, Shanghai University of Sport, 200438, Shanghai, China.
Pang Xiao-WuWushu College, Shanghai University of Sport, 200438, Shanghai, China.
Shen Meng-LuWushu College, Shanghai University of Sport, 200438, Shanghai, China.
Yang Su-YongSchool of Sport Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, 200438, Shanghai, China.
Xu DingShanghai Drug Administration, 200080, Shanghai, China.
Xiao KeShanghai Gaojing Drug Compulsory Detoxification and Rehabilitation Center, 200439, Shanghai, China.
Wang Tian-YuanWushu College, Shanghai University of Sport, 200438, Shanghai, China.
Wang Jia-BinWushu College, Shanghai University of Sport, 200438, Shanghai, China.
Zhu DongSchool of International Education, Shanghai University of Sport, 200438, 650 Qing Yuan Huan road, Yang Pu District, Shanghai, China. zhudong@sus.edu.cn.

Funding

National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) 2018YFC0807405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIIT has recently been widely used for health promotion in healthy people and patients with chronic diseases. Exercise can help SUD reduce drug cravings, enhance mental health and return to normal life. However, whether HIIT can bring better physical rehabilitation benefits to individuals with SUD than MICT is unclear. The study aimed to compare the effects of HIIT versus MICT on the physical fitness of individuals with SUD.

methodsOne hundred twenty individuals with amphetamine-type stimulant dependence voluntarily participated in this study. They were randomly assigned to the HIIT group and MICT group. Both groups received training three times a week. The intervention lasted from January 2019 to December 2019. Physical fitness was assessed at the baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months, including blood pressure (BP), vital capacity(VC), hand grip, push-up, sit-and-reach, one-leg standing with eyes closed and choice reaction time. The craving level was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale at baseline, 6 months and 12 months to see any change along with the improvement in physical fitness. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was applied to analyse the differences in change by group (HIIT and MICT) and time (baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months).

resultsThe within-group factor displayed significant changes in the HIIT and MICT groups in terms of systolic BP (F

conclusionsAfter 12 months of intervention, physical fitness improved while craving level decreased in the two groups. These findings suggest that both HIIT and MICT have positive effects on individuals with SUD in terms of physical fitness.

trial registrationChiCTR1900022158 Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: Registered 27th March, 2019.

Indexed as

Amphetamine‐type stimulantsHigh‐intensity interval trainingModerate‐intensity continuous trainingPhysical fitnessSubstance use disorderTai chi

Identifiers

PMID33478548
PMCPMC7818546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.