Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33478080›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitory Therapy in Sarcomas: Is There Light at the End of the Tunnel?

Vasiliki Siozopoulou, Andreas Domen, Karen Zwaenepoel, Annelies Van Beeck, Evelien Smits, Patrick Pauwels, Elly Marcq

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Repurposing public sarcoma multi-omics for neoantigen discovery.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Development of a First-in-Class Click Chemistry-Based Cancer Therapeutic, from Preclinical Evaluation to a First-in-Human Dose Escalation Clinical Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Treatment of De-Differentiated Liposarcoma in the Era of Immunotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vasiliki SiozopoulouDepartment of Pathology, Antwerp University Hospital, 2650 Edegem, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8608-4660
Andreas DomenCenter for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1398-3061
Karen ZwaenepoelDepartment of Pathology, Antwerp University Hospital, 2650 Edegem, Belgium.
Annelies Van BeeckDepartment of Orthopedics, Antwerp University Hospital, 2650 Edegem, Belgium.
Evelien SmitsCenter for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9255-3435
Patrick PauwelsDepartment of Pathology, Antwerp University Hospital, 2650 Edegem, Belgium.
Elly MarcqCenter for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3173-0500
University of Antwerp · BEAntwerp University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soft tissue and bone sarcomas are a very heterogeneous group of tumors with many subtypes for which diagnosis and treatment remains a very challenging task. On top of that, the treatment choices are limited, and the prognosis of aggressive sarcomas remains poor. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have drawn a lot of attention last years because of their promising response rates and their durable effects. ICIs are currently widely used in the daily routine practice for the treatment of a different malignancies, such as melanoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, and non-small cell lung carcinoma. Still, ICIs are not included in the standard treatment protocols of the different sarcoma types. However, a plethora of clinical trials investigates the clinical benefit of ICIs in sarcomas. There is clear need to develop predictive biomarkers to determine which sarcoma patients are most likely to benefit from immune checkpoint blockade. This review will focus on (i) the clinical trial results on the use of ICIs in different sarcoma types; and on (ii) possible biomarkers predictive for the effectiveness of these drugs in sarcomas.

Indexed as

clinical trialsimmune checkpoint blockade (ICB)immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)immunotherapypredictive biomarkersprogrammed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)sarcoma

Identifiers

PMID33478080
PMCPMC7835811
OpenAlexW3122098008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.