Evaluation of Fluorescent Cu

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Novel Optical Sensor-Based Organic Chromophore for the Detection of Copper Ions.Biosensors · 2026
   Article
2. A Terbium Ion-Based Dual-Ligand Fluorescent Probe for Highly Selective and Sensitive Detection of CuJournal of fluorescence · 2025
   Article
3. Development of a Fluorescein-Based Probe with an "Off-On" Mechanism for Selective Detection of Copper (II) Ions and Its Application in Imaging of Living Cells.Biosensors · 2023
   Article
4. Microwave-assisted synthesis for a highly selective rhodamine 6G-derived fluorescent sensor and bioimaging.Inorganic chemistry communications · 2023
   Article
5. Rhodamine-Based Fluorescent Probe for Highly Selective Determination of HgACS omega · 2022
   Article
6. NPA-CuInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as