Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33477881›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2021

Association between Breakfast Skipping and Body Weight-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Longitudinal Studies.

Julia Wicherski, Sabrina Schlesinger, Florian Fischer

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. No effects of high-The British journal of nutrition · 2025
    Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Circadian nutrition and obesity: timing as a nutritional strategy.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia WicherskiSchool of Public Health, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
Sabrina SchlesingerGerman Diabetes Center, Institute for Biometry and Epidemiology, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Florian FischerInstitute of Public Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4388-1245

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, increasing rates of obesity are one of the most important health issues. The association between breakfast skipping and body weight is contradictory between cross-sectional and interventional studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to summarize this association based on observational longitudinal studies. We included prospective studies on breakfast skipping and overweight/obesity or weight change in adults. The literature was searched until September 2020 in PubMed and Web of Science. Summary risk ratios (RRs) or β coefficients with a 95% confidence interval (CI), respectively, were estimated in pairwise meta-analyses by applying a random-effects model. In total, nine studies were included in the systematic review and five of them were included in the meta-analyses. The meta-analyses indicated an 11% increased RR for overweight/obesity when breakfast was skipped on ≥3 days per week compared to ≤2 days per week (95% CI: 1.04, 1.19,

Indexed as

Body WeightBreakfastFeeding BehaviorAdultBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleObesityObservational Studies as TopicOdds RatioOverweightWeight GainYoung AdultBody Mass Index (BMI) changebreakfast skippingmeta-analysisobesityobservational longitudinal studiesoverweightsystematic reviewweight gain

Identifiers

PMID33477881
PMCPMC7832891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.