Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33477861›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Bayesian Meta-Analysis for Binary Data and Prior Distribution on Models.

Miguel-Angel Negrín-Hernández, María Martel-Escobar, Francisco-José Vázquez-Polo

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bayesian Methods for Meta-Analyses of Binary Outcomes: Implementations, Examples, and Impact of Priors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miguel-Angel Negrín-HernándezDepartment of Quantitative Methods & TiDES Institute, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, E-35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7074-6268
María Martel-EscobarDepartment of Quantitative Methods & TiDES Institute, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, E-35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7013-4747
Francisco-José Vázquez-PoloDepartment of Quantitative Methods & TiDES Institute, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, E-35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0632-6138
Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In meta-analysis, the structure of the between-sample heterogeneity plays a crucial role in estimating the meta-parameter. A Bayesian meta-analysis for binary data has recently been proposed that measures this heterogeneity by clustering the samples and then determining the posterior probability of the cluster models through model selection. The meta-parameter is then estimated using Bayesian model averaging techniques. Although an objective Bayesian meta-analysis is proposed for each type of heterogeneity, we concentrate the attention of this paper on priors over the models. We consider four alternative priors which are motivated by reasonable but different assumptions. A frequentist validation with simulated data has been carried out to analyze the properties of each prior distribution for a set of different number of studies and sample sizes. The results show the importance of choosing an adequate model prior as the posterior probabilities for the models are very sensitive to it. The hierarchical Poisson prior and the hierarchical uniform prior show a good performance when the real model is the homogeneity, or when the sample sizes are high enough. However, the uniform prior can detect the true model when it is an intermediate model (neither homogeneity nor heterogeneity) even for small sample sizes and few studies. An illustrative example with real data is also given, showing the sensitivity of the estimation of the meta-parameter to the model prior.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremModels, StatisticalCluster AnalysisHumansProbabilitySample Sizebayesian meta-analysisbinary dataclusteringfrequentist validationpriors

Identifiers

PMID33477861
PMCPMC7832911
OpenAlexW3122553247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.