ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021
Nursing Students' Satisfaction: A Comparison between Medium- and High-Fidelity Simulation Training.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing Communication and Empathy Skills in Geriatric Care: Nurses' Reflections on Simulation-Based Training for Patient Interaction and Education.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
- Article
- Factors associated with nursing students' satisfaction with simulation-based assessments: interaction between psychological safety and gender in a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- 360-degree projection simulation versus traditional simulation in undergraduate paramedicine education: a pilot randomised controlled trial.British paramedic journal · 2025Article
- Nursing Students' Satisfaction with Clinical Simulation: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Article
- Assessing satisfaction in simulation among nursing students: psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience - Italian Version scale.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Undergraduate Student Nurses' Satisfaction, Self-confidence, and Perception of High-fidelity Simulation-based Learning on Critically-ill Patients.Acta medica Philippina · 2024Article
- Simulation in contemporary medical education: Current practices and the way forward.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2024Article
- Comparative study between high-fidelity simulation and medium-fidelity simulation in decision-making of nursing students: experimental study.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2024Article
- Including audience response systems in debriefing. A mixed study during nursing simulation-based learning.BMC nursing · 2023Article
- The Role of Fundamental Nursing Practices Simulation on Students' Competencies and Learning Satisfaction: Repeated Measured Design.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The impact of design elements on undergraduate nursing students' educational outcomes in simulation education: protocol for a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2022Article
- Use of Computer-Based Scenarios for Clinical Teaching: Impact on Nursing Students' Decision-Making Skills.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Undergraduate Nursing Students' Attitude and Perception Toward High-Fidelity Simulation-Based Education in a Middle Eastern Country.SAGE open nursingArticle
- The perspectives of health sciences students the new way of learning: Mixed methods design.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Training based on clinical simulation is an effective method of teaching in nursing. Nevertheless, there is no clear evidence about if it is better to use high- or medium-fidelity simulation. The aim is to analyse if students are more satisfied when their clinical simulation practices are based on high-fidelity simulation (HFS) or medium-fidelity simulation (MFS). Students´ satisfaction was assessed using the Satisfaction Scale Questionnaire with High-Fidelity Clinical Simulation. The sample is composed of 393 students from two Spanish Universities. Satisfaction with simulation in nursing students is significantly greater in MFS than HFS. Simulation is beneficial for learning in all its forms, but for the acquisition of basic skills, and at a lower cost, MFS proves to be effective. However, high-fidelity is not always better than medium-fidelity as this depends on the student's level of knowledge and clinical experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.