Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33477674›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Advances in Research of Adult Gliomas.

Alina Finch, Georgios Solomou, Victoria Wykes, Ute Pohl, Chiara Bardella, Colin Watts

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Crude Venom from Sea AnemoneMarine drugs · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alina FinchInstitute of Cancer Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Georgios SolomouInstitute of Cancer Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9795-0517
Victoria WykesInstitute of Cancer Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2998-8919
Ute PohlDepartment of Cellular Pathology, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2WB, UK.
Chiara BardellaInstitute of Cancer Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Colin WattsInstitute of Cancer Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffuse gliomas are the most frequent brain tumours, representing 75% of all primary malignant brain tumours in adults. Because of their locally aggressive behaviour and the fact that they cannot be cured by current therapies, they represent one of the most devastating cancers. The present review summarises recent advances in our understanding of glioma development and progression by use of various in vitro and in vivo models, as well as more complex techniques including cultures of 3D organoids and organotypic slices. We discuss the progress that has been made in understanding glioma heterogeneity, alteration in gene expression and DNA methylation, as well as advances in various in silico models. Lastly current treatment options and future clinical trials, which aim to improve early diagnosis and disease monitoring, are also discussed.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsBrain NeoplasmsDisease Models, AnimalDNA MethylationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGliomaHumansclinical trialdiffuse gliomasexperimental modelsglioma heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID33477674
PMCPMC7831916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.