ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021
Operative and Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Living-Donor Surgery on Uterus Transplantation: A Literature Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deceased Donor Uterus Transplantation: A Narrative Review of the First 24 Published Cases.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Living-Donor Uterus Transplantation: A Clinical Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Uterus Transplantation as a Surgical Innovation.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2023Article
- Differences between living and deceased donation in human uterus transplantation: A narrative review.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2023Review
- Living donor surgery in uterus transplantation: A delicate hysterectomy technique in gynecological surgery.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2022Article
- Uterus Transplantation: From a Deceased Donor or Living Donor?Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Comment on "Birth of a Healthy Baby 9 years after a Surgically Successful Deceased Donor Uterus Transplant".Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe surgical approach and choice of drainage veins for uterus transplantation living-donor surgery have been investigated to reduce invasiveness.
methodsA thorough search of the PubMed database was conducted. The search was not limited by language or date of publication. The data were collected on 13 October 2020. Two reviewers independently assessed each article and determined eligibility for inclusion in the review article. Inclusion criteria were English peer-reviewed articles reporting surgical information or postoperative course, articles regarding animal research on UTx, UTx on deceased donors, or not original articles.
resultsOf the 51 operations within 26 articles reviewed, the mean operative time was shortest in the laparoscopic approach, and longest in the robot-assisted approach. The mean blood loss was less in the laparoscopic and robot-assisted approaches than in the open approach. In cases where the uterine veins were not preserved, the mean operative time was shortened by each approach and the mean blood loss decreased with the laparoscopic and robot-assisted approaches.
conclusionsThese procedures may contribute to less invasive living-donor surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.