Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33477532›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Impella CP Implantation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Cardiac Arrest: A Multicenter Experience.

Vassili Panagides, Henrik Vase, Sachin P Shah, Mir B Basir, Julien Mancini, Hayaan Kamran, Supria Batra, Marc Laine, Hans Eiskjær, Steffen Christensen and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Contemporary overview of current percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices for advanced heart failure: a narrative review.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. The Heart Team approach to cardiac arrest.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Vassili PanagidesIntensive Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille University, 13015 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0012-1289
Henrik VaseDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.
Sachin P ShahDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA 01805, USA.
Mir B BasirDepartment of Cardiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Julien ManciniDepartment of Public Health (BIOSTIC), Aix-Marseille University, INSERM, IRD, APHM, UMR1252, SESSTIM, Hôpital de la Timone, 13005 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9500-8598
Hayaan KamranDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA 01805, USA.
Supria BatraDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA 01805, USA.
Marc LaineIntensive Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille University, 13015 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1458-5543
Hans EiskjærDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.
Steffen ChristensenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.
Mina KaramiDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Franck PaganelliIntensive Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille University, 13015 Marseille, France.
Jose P S HenriquesDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Laurent BonelloIntensive Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille University, 13015 Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImpella CP is a left ventricular pump which may serve as a circulatory support during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for cardiac arrest (CA). Nevertheless, the survival rate and factors associated with survival in patients undergoing Impella insertion during CPR for CA are unknown.

methodsWe performed a retrospective multicenter international registry of patients undergoing Impella insertion during on-going CPR for in- or out-of-hospital CA. We recorded immediate and 30-day survival with and without neurologic impairment using the cerebral performance category score and evaluated the factors associated with survival.

resultsThirty-five patients had an Impella CP implanted during CPR for CA. Refractory ventricular arrhythmias were the most frequent initial rhythm (65.7%). In total, 65.7% of patients immediately survived. At 30 days, 45.7% of patients were still alive. The 30-day survival rate without neurological impairment was 37.1%. In univariate analysis, survival was associated with both an age < 75 years and a time from arrest to CPR ≤ 5 min (

conclusionsIn our multicenter registry, Impella CP insertion during ongoing CPR for CA was associated with a 37.1% rate of 30-day survival without neurological impairment. The factors associated with survival were a young age and a time from arrest to CPR ≤ 5 min.

Indexed as

cardiac arrestcardiopulmonary resuscitationhemodynamic support deviceImpellarefractory cardiac arrest

Identifiers

PMID33477532
PMCPMC7831079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.