ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Vascular Wall Reactions to Coronary Stents-Clinical Implications for Stent Failure.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the Complexities of Bone Implants and Stents: Factors Influencing Successful Tissue Integration.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- The "Mushroom Sign": An Interesting Case Report of Extreme Stent Malapposition.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Systemic pro-inflammatory response following bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using endobronchial valves.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Mechanisms of ferroptosis and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist in post-percutaneous coronary intervention restenosis.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2025Review
- Manufacturing, Processing, and Characterization of Self-Expanding Metallic Stents: A Comprehensive Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Synthesis and characterization of amine-functionalized graphene as a nitric oxide-generating coating for vascular stents.Applied physics reviews · 2024Article
- Nitric Oxide Releasing Nanomaterials for Cardiovascular Applications.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2024Review
- A Predictive Toxicokinetic Model for Nickel Leaching from Vascular Stents.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024Article
- Risk factors for instent restenosis of sirolimus-coated stents in coronary intervention for patients with unstable angina.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Review
- Advantages and prospects of optical coherence tomography in interventional therapy of coronary heart disease (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022Review
- Modulating mTOR Signaling as a Promising Therapeutic Strategy for Atherosclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with Takayasu arteritis coexisting with myocardial ischemia and neurological symptoms: A multicenter, long-term, follow-up study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: Predictors and Treatment.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2021Review
- Coronary Stent Strut Fractures: Classification, Prevalence and Clinical Associations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary stents belong to the most commonly implanted devices worldwide. A number of different types of stent exist, with very different mechanical and biochemical characteristics that influence their interactions with vascular tissues. Inappropriate inflammatory reactions are the major cause of the two major complications that follow implantation of stents in a percentage as high as 5-20%. It is therefore important to understand these reactions and how different they are among different generations of stents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.