Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33477204›Full record

ArticleHealth & social care in the community2021

Determinants of informal care-giving in various social relationships in the Netherlands.

Mirjam de Klerk, Alice de Boer, Inger Plaisier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & social care in the community, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Economic Costs of Informal Care: Estimates from a National Cross-Sectional Survey in The Netherlands.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Article
  8. Childhood Adversities and Caregiving for Older Parents: Building Capacity for a Caring Society.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A systematic review comparing cardiovascular disease among informal carers and non-carers.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mirjam de KlerkThe Netherlands Institute for Social Research, The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8231-5054
Alice de BoerThe Netherlands Institute for Social Research, The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6881-3559
Inger PlaisierThe Netherlands Institute for Social Research, The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7740-5028

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates determinants for offering help to family members, neighbours and friends, based on the Informal Care Model. We do so in pooled representative data for the Netherlands collected in 2014 and 2016 (persons >17 years, n = 13,165). One-third provides informal care to a person with health problems or impairments: partners (4%, n = 671), parents or children (16%, n = 2,381), distant relatives (6%, n = 858), friends or neighbours (6%, n = 839). Marginal effects show differences in the associations of care-giving relationships with sociodemographic factors, barriers and beliefs. Helping a partner is related to age, gender (older people and men are more likely to help) and household composition (singles help less often). Care for close family is given often by 45-64 year olds, women, multiperson households and those with strong family beliefs. Helping second-degree relatives correlates with age (young people help more often), barriers (those living with children help less often) and beliefs (people with professional background in care and people who attend church or mosque helping more often). Providing non-kin care is associated with age and education level (young people less likely to help, people with a high education more likely), barriers (having a fulltime job) and beliefs (work experience in care, church or mosque attendance and norms). The supply of care to partners and close family is mainly associated with sociodemographic factors and barriers while the provision of care to distant family and non-kin is also correlated with beliefs. If desirable policy is to create more informal care, investment in the combination of work and informal care, childcare and supportive arrangements for older community living couples is recommended. It also might be worthwhile to enhance beliefs about the usefulness of helping each other in times of need.

Indexed as

FamilySocial SupportAdolescentAgedCaregiversChildFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsMaleNetherlandsPatient Carebarriersbeliefsfamily care-givinginformal carersnon-kinsocial relations

Identifiers

PMID33477204
PMCPMC8596597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.