Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33477203›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2021

Aged care residents' prioritization of care: A mixed-methods study.

Kristiana Ludlow, Kate Churruca, Virginia Mumford, Louise A Ellis, Jeffrey Braithwaite

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Community Preferences for Allied Health Services in Residential Aged Care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Aged care residents' prioritization of care: A mixed-methods study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristiana LudlowAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7284-5625
Kate ChurrucaAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9923-3116
Virginia MumfordAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7915-0615
Louise A EllisAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6902-4578
Jeffrey BraithwaiteAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0296-4957

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEliciting residents' priorities for their care is fundamental to delivering person-centred care in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). Prioritization involves ordering different aspects of care in relation to one another by level of importance. By understanding residents' priorities, care can be tailored to residents' needs while considering practical limitations of RACFs.

objectivesTo investigate aged care residents' prioritization of care.

designA mixed-methods study comprising Q methodology and qualitative methods. SETTING AND

participantsThirty-eight residents living in one of five Australian RACFs.

methodParticipants completed a card-sorting activity using Q methodology in which they ordered 34 aspects of care on a pre-defined grid by level of importance. Data were analysed using inverted factor analysis to identify factors representing shared viewpoints. Participants also completed a think-aloud task, demographic questionnaire, post-sorting interview and semi-structured interview. Inductive content analysis of qualitative data was conducted to interpret shared viewpoints and to identify influences on prioritization decision making.

resultsFour viewpoints on care prioritization were identified through Q methodology: Maintaining a sense of spirituality and self in residential care; information sharing and family involvement; self-reliance; and timely access to staff member support. Across the participant sample, residents prioritized being treated with respect, the management of medical conditions, and their independence. Inductive content analysis revealed four influences on prioritization decisions: level of dependency; dynamic needs; indifference; and availability of staff.

conclusionsRecommendations for providing care that align with residents' priorities include establishing open communication channels with residents, supporting residents' independence and enforcing safer staffing ratios.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHomes for the AgedAgedAustraliaCommunicationHumansSurveys and Questionnairesaged caredecision makingnursing homesperson-centred carepriority-settingresidential facilities

Identifiers

PMID33477203
PMCPMC8077118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.