Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33477007›Full record

ArticleESMO open2021

Circulating miR-30b-5p levels in plasma as a novel potential biomarker for early detection of breast cancer.

A Adam-Artigues, I Garrido-Cano, S Simón, B Ortega, S Moragón, A Lameirinhas, V Constâncio, S Salta, O Burgués, B Bermejo and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

A Adam-ArtiguesBiomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain.
I Garrido-CanoBiomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain.
S SimónBiomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain; Clinical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
B OrtegaBiomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain; Clinical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
S MoragónBiomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain; Clinical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
A LameirinhasBiomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain.
V ConstâncioCancer Biology and Epigenetics Group Research Center, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (CI-IPOP), Porto, Portugal.
S SaltaCancer Biology and Epigenetics Group Research Center, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (CI-IPOP), Porto, Portugal.
O BurguésBiomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain; Clinical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain.
B BermejoBiomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain; Clinical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain.
R HenriqueCancer Biology and Epigenetics Group Research Center, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (CI-IPOP), Porto, Portugal; Department of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Department of Pathology and Molecular Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar University of Porto (ICBAS-UP), Porto, Portugal.
A LluchClinical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain; Department of Medicine, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.
C JerónimoCancer Biology and Epigenetics Group Research Center, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (CI-IPOP), Porto, Portugal; Department of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Department of Pathology and Molecular Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar University of Porto (ICBAS-UP), Porto, Portugal.
P ErolesBiomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain; Department of Physiology, Universitat de València, València, Spain. Electronic address: pilar.eroles@uv.es.
J M CejalvoBiomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain; Clinical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: jmcejalvo@incliva.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, microRNAs have been demonstrated to be potential non-invasive biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis assessment or prediction of response to treatment in cancer. In this study, we evaluate the potential of miR-30b-5p as a biomarker for early diagnosis of breast cancer (BC) in tissue and plasma.

methodsExpression of miR-30b-5p was determined in a series of 112 BC and 40 normal breast tissues. Circulating miR-30b-5p levels in plasma samples were determined in a discovery cohort of 38 BC patients and 40 healthy donors and in a validation cohort of 83 BC patients and 83 healthy volunteers. miR-30b-5p expression was measured by quantitative real-time PCR and receiver operating characteristics curve analysis was carried out.

resultsThe miR-30b-5p expression was significantly lower in BC tissue than in healthy breast samples. In contrast, circulating miR-30b-5p levels were significantly higher in BC patients compared with healthy donors. Furthermore, circulating miR-30b-5p levels were significantly higher in patients with positive axillary lymph node and de novo metastatic patients. Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis demonstrated a good diagnostic potential of miR-30b-5p to detect BC even at an early stage of the disease.

conclusionThus, we highlight the potential of miR-30b-5p as a non-invasive, fast, reproducible and cost-effective diagnostic biomarker of BC.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMicroRNAsBiomarkers, TumorEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsMIRN30a microRNA, humanbreast cancerdiagnosismicroRNAplasma

Identifiers

PMID33477007
PMCPMC7820029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.