Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33476931›Full record

ReviewCellular immunology2021

Reactive myelopoiesis and the onset of myeloid-mediated immune suppression: Implications for adoptive cell therapy.

Patrick Innamarato, Shari Pilon-Thomas

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Dual-targeted ping-pong CAR T cells: Leveraging peripheral expansion to improve solid tumor immunotherapy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patrick InnamaratoDepartment of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Shari Pilon-ThomasDepartment of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA. Electronic address: shari.pilon-thomas@moffitt.org.
Moffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI Christine O'Connell · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adoptive T cell therapy (ACT) in combination with lymphodepleting chemotherapy is an effective strategy to induce the eradication of cancer, providing long-term regressions in patients. However, only a minority of patients that receive ACT with tumor-specific T cells exhibit durable benefit. Thus, there is an urgent need to characterize mechanisms of resistance and define strategies to alleviate immunosuppression in the context of ACT in cancer. This article reviews the importance of lymphodepleting regimens in promoting the optimal engraftment and expansion of T cells in hosts after adoptive transfer. In addition, we discuss the role of concomitant immunosuppression and the accumulation of myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) during immune recovery after lymphodepleting regimens and mobilization regimens.

Indexed as

Adoptive TransferAnimalsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyHumansImmune ToleranceImmunosuppression TherapyImmunotherapy, AdoptiveLymphocyte DepletionMyeloid CellsMyeloid-Derived Suppressor CellsMyelopoiesisNeoplasmsT-LymphocytesAdoptive T cell therapyCyclophosphamideFludarabineG-CSFHematopoiesisImmunosuppressionLymphodepletionMDSCsMyelopoiesis

Identifiers

PMID33476931
PMCPMC7901256
OpenAlexW3117142663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.