ArticleJournal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology2021
Field evaluation of HIV-1 viral load monitoring in adults and children receiving antiretroviral treatment in Nigeria by dried blood spot testing with RealTime HIV-1 on m2000.
Article in Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Integrated Sample Referral System for HIV Viral Load and Early Infant Diagnosis in North-Western Province, Zambia-A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Use of laboratory-developed assays in global HIV-1 treatment-monitoring and research.Scientific reports · 2023Review
- The plasma separation card as a novel solution for enhancing central laboratory capability for HIV-1 viral load monitoring in limited-access settings.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- India's adaptation of HIV services to ensure continuity of service delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In resource-limited settings, use of dried blood spots (DBS) could be a pragmatic alternative to plasma for VL monitoring in people living with HIV (PLWH). We compared results from DBS to standard plasma VL testing under field conditions in patients receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART). DBS cards were prepared from venous blood (V-DBS), finger-pricks using micro-capillary tubes (M-DBS), and direct spotting (D-DBS). DBS and matched EDTA plasma were tested on the Abbott m2000 platform using the appropriate RealTime HIV-1 quantitative CE protocol. Matched plasma samples were also tested on the Roche COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS TaqMan version 2.0. Diagnostic accuracy indicators (sensitivity, specificity, misclassification rate, and kappa coefficient) for viral failure (VF) based on different VL threshold levels and agreement of absolute VL were calculated. A total of 669 participants provided 2676 samples. V-DBS had a peak sensitivity for VF of 89.1 % [95 % CI: 85.5-92.7] at the 1000 copies/mL threshold and a peak specificity of 97.4 % [95 % CI: 95.9-99.0] at the 5000 copies/mL threshold. The lowest proportion of upward misclassification (patients classified with VF who actually had viral suppression) for V-DBS was 3.1 % [95 % CI: 1.4-4.8] at the 5000 copies/mL threshold, whereas the lowest proportion of downward misclassification (patients classified as undetectable who actually had VF) was 10.9 % [95 % CI: 7.2-14.5] at the 1000 copies/mL threshold. Abbott RealTime HIV-1 VL results from all 3 DBS types for adults and children showed strong correlation with the gold standard plasma-based assay. DBS could be useful for monitoring VL in resource limited settings such as Nigeria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.