ArticleNursing open2021
Developing a nursing diagnosis for the risk for malnutrition: a mixed-method study.
Article in Nursing open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of risk assessment nursing combined with psychological care on SAS scores, SDS scores, and patient compliance in patients in the surgical intensive care unit: a single-center, randomized controlled trial.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Trial
- Content validation of the NANDA-I nursing diagnosis risk for perioperative hypothermia (00254).International journal of nursing knowledge · 2025Article
- "Eat Enough"-A nurse-led intervention to enhance hospitalized older adults' protein and energy nutrition.International journal of nursing knowledge · 2025Article
- What should nurses do on post-stroke depression? A global systematic assessment of clinical practice guidelines.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Recognising undernutrition in a community hospital: the nursing judgement is insufficient.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2022Observational
- Developing a nursing diagnosis for the risk for malnutrition: a mixed-method study.Nursing open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimAs the risk for malnutrition in older people in hospitals is often underreported, we aimed to develop a risk nursing diagnosis, including label, definition and risk factors.
designA convergent parallel mixed-methods design was employed.
methodsA literature review led to risk factors, validated by 22 hospitalized older people's perspectives and observations, including their nursing records. Per participant, one interview (qualitative), one non-participatory observation of three meals (198 hr; qualitative) and one nursing record evaluation (quantitative) were conducted.
findingsAccording to the classification system of NANDA International, the risk for protein-energy malnutrition is defined with 18 risk factors, including associated conditions. Content validated risk factors are presented from three participants with the most, medium and least coherent nursing record, measured with the Quality of Diagnosis, Intervention and Outcomes tool.
conclusionThis new nursing diagnosis supports nurses to manage the risk for malnutrition and optimize older people's nutrition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.