Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33476154›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2021

Systematic Identification of Protein Phosphorylation-Mediated Interactions.

Brendan M Floyd, Kevin Drew, Edward M Marcotte

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. ThrScience advances · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Role ofJournal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brendan M FloydDepartment of Molecular Biosciences Center for Systems and Synthetic Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7412-0492
Kevin DrewDepartment of Molecular Biosciences Center for Systems and Synthetic Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States.
Edward M MarcotteDepartment of Molecular Biosciences Center for Systems and Synthetic Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States.
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Proteomics and model organism humanization to decode human geneticsR35GM122480 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI EDWARD M MARCOTTE · 2017 to 2026
$5.4M
Mapping the blood cell protein complexosomeR01DK110520 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI EMILI, ANDREW, MARCOTTE, EDWARD M · 2016 to 2018
$727k
Discovery and characterization of novel ciliopathy protein complexesK99HD092613 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DREW, KEVIN · 2017 to 2018
$200k
NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD092613NICHD NIH HHS L40 HD096554NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK110520NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein phosphorylation is a key regulatory mechanism involved in nearly every eukaryotic cellular process. Increasingly sensitive mass spectrometry approaches have identified hundreds of thousands of phosphorylation sites, but the functions of a vast majority of these sites remain unknown, with fewer than 5% of sites currently assigned a function. To increase our understanding of functional protein phosphorylation we developed an approach (phospho-DIFFRAC) for identifying the phosphorylation-dependence of protein assemblies in a systematic manner. A combination of nonspecific protein phosphatase treatment, size-exclusion chromatography, and mass spectrometry allowed us to identify changes in protein interactions after the removal of phosphate modifications. With this approach we were able to identify 316 proteins involved in phosphorylation-sensitive interactions. We recovered known phosphorylation-dependent interactors such as the FACT complex and spliceosome, as well as identified novel interactions such as the tripeptidyl peptidase TPP2 and the supraspliceosome component ZRANB2. More generally, we find phosphorylation-dependent interactors to be strongly enriched for RNA-binding proteins, providing new insight into the role of phosphorylation in RNA binding. By searching directly for phosphorylated amino acid residues in mass spectrometry data, we identified the likely regulatory phosphosites on ZRANB2 and FACT complex subunit SSRP1. This study provides both a method and resource for obtaining a better understanding of the role of phosphorylation in native macromolecular assemblies. All mass spectrometry data are available through PRIDE (accession #PXD021422).

Indexed as

ProteinsAmino Acid SequenceChromatography, GelMass SpectrometryPhosphorylationProteinshigh-throughputprotein complexesprotein interactionsprotein phosphorylationsize-exclusion chromatography

Identifiers

PMID33476154
PMCPMC8896092
OpenAlexW3121875794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.