Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33476062›Full record

ReviewLasers in surgery and medicine2021

A Clinical Perspective on the Automated Analysis of Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in Dermatology.

Joseph N Mehrabi, Erica G Baugh, Alexander Fast, Griffin Lentsch, Mihaela Balu, Bonnie A Lee, Kristen M Kelly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Artificial intelligence and skin cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joseph N MehrabiDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, Irvine, California, 92697.ORCID 0000-0002-2212-7075
Erica G BaughDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, Irvine, California, 92697.
Alexander FastBeckman Laser Institute, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, 92612.
Griffin LentschBeckman Laser Institute, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, 92612.
Mihaela BaluBeckman Laser Institute, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, 92612.
Bonnie A LeeDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, Irvine, California, 92697.
Kristen M KellyDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, Irvine, California, 92697.ORCID 0000-0002-5988-2197

Funding

Univ.of Calif., Irvine Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA062203 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Melanie Funes · 1994 to 2026
$57.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA062203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesNon-invasive optical imaging has the potential to provide a diagnosis without the need for biopsy. One such technology is reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), which uses low power, near-infrared laser light to enable real-time in vivo visualization of superficial human skin from the epidermis down to the papillary dermis. Although RCM has great potential as a diagnostic tool, there is a need for the development of reliable image analysis programs, as acquired grayscale images can be difficult and time-consuming to visually assess. The purpose of this review is to provide a clinical perspective on the current state of artificial intelligence (AI) for the analysis and diagnostic utility of RCM imaging. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND

methodsA systematic PubMed search was conducted with additional relevant literature obtained from reference lists.

resultsAlgorithms used for skin stratification, classification of pigmented lesions, and the quantification of photoaging were reviewed. Image segmentation, statistical methods, and machine learning techniques are among the most common methods used to analyze RCM image stacks. The poor visual contrast within RCM images and difficulty navigating image stacks were mediated by machine learning algorithms, which allowed the identification of specific skin layers.

conclusionsAI analysis of RCM images has the potential to increase the clinical utility of this emerging technology. A number of different techniques have been utilized but further refinements are necessary to allow consistent accurate assessments for diagnosis. The automated detection of skin cancers requires more development, but future applications are truly boundless, and it is compelling to envision the role that AI will have in the practice of dermatology. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Indexed as

DermatologySkin NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalSkinartificial intelligencemachine learningmelanocytic lesionsphoto-agingpigmented lesionsreflectance confocal microscopyskin stratification

Identifiers

PMID33476062
PMCPMC12551406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.