Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33476046›Full record

ArticleChild development2021

Cultural Components of Sex Differences in Color Preference.

Jac T M Davis, Ellen Robertson, Sheina Lew-Levy, Karri Neldner, Rohan Kapitany, Mark Nielsen, Melissa Hines

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child development, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jac T M DavisUniversity of Cambridge.ORCID 0000-0001-6700-5648
Ellen RobertsonUniversity of Cambridge.
Sheina Lew-LevySimon Fraser University.ORCID 0000-0002-1250-6418
Karri NeldnerUniversity of Queensland.ORCID 0000-0002-8237-5679
Rohan KapitanyUniversity of Queensland.ORCID 0000-0002-1944-2613
Mark NielsenKeele University.ORCID 0000-0002-0402-8372
Melissa HinesUniversity of Cambridge.

Funding

Cambridge Commonwealth, European and International TrustClare College, University of CambridgeGates Cambridge TrustSchool of the Biological Sciences, University of CambridgeSmuts Memorial Fund, University of CambridgeSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada 752-2016-0555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preferences for pink and blue were tested in children aged 4-11 years in three small-scale societies: Shipibo villages in the Peruvian Amazon, kastom villages in the highlands of Tanna Island, Vanuatu, and BaYaka foragers in the northern Republic of Congo; and compared to children from an Australian global city (total N = 232). No sex differences were found in preference for pink in any of the three societies not influenced by global culture (ds - 0.31-0.23), in contrast to a female preference for pink in the global city (d = 1.24). Results suggest that the pairing of female and pink is a cultural phenomenon and is not driven by an essential preference for pink in girls.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAustraliaCongoFemaleHumansMaleVanuatu

Identifiers

PMID33476046
PMCPMC8451877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.