Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33475841›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2021

Superiority of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score (TLICS) over AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification for the surgical management decision of traumatic spine injury in the pediatric population.

Corentin Dauleac, Carmine Mottolese, Pierre-Aurélien Beuriat, Alexandru Szathmari, Federico Di Rocco

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. [Effectiveness of sagittal top compression reduction technique in treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral fractures].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Pediatric Spine Trauma.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Corentin DauleacService de Neurochirurgie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique Et Neurochirurgical Pierre Wertheimer, 69003, Lyon, France.
Carmine MottoleseService de Neurochirurgie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique Et Neurochirurgical Pierre Wertheimer, 69003, Lyon, France.
Pierre-Aurélien BeuriatService de Neurochirurgie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique Et Neurochirurgical Pierre Wertheimer, 69003, Lyon, France.
Alexandru SzathmariService de Neurochirurgie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique Et Neurochirurgical Pierre Wertheimer, 69003, Lyon, France.
Federico Di RoccoUniversité de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard, 69008, Lyon, France. federico.dirocco@chu-lyon.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThoracolumbar fractures are the most common kind of spine injury in children. Several types of spine injury can occur, and for this reason, treatment algorithms have been put in place for the management of these patients. At present, the thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score system (TLICS) and the thoracolumbar AOSpine injury score (AOSpine score) aimed at providing treatment recommendations. We aimed to assess the reliability, in children, of the TLICS scoring and AOSpine scoring systems, and to define the superiority of one of the methods of scoring, to spread its use in routine clinical management in the pediatric spine trauma.

methodsA retrospective chart review of consecutive children admitted to a Level 1 trauma center for traumatic thoracolumbar fractures, between 2006 and 2019, was performed. We compared the management we performed in clinical practice in children with spine trauma, to the decisional algorithms based on the TLICS and AOSpine scores. According to these scores, surgical treatment should be performed when the TLICS score ≥ 5 and the AOSpine score > 5; and surgical or conservative treatment was considered reasonable when the TLICS score = 4 and the AOSpine score = 4 or 5. Surgical indications were based on the clinical status, the anatomy of the fracture, and the risk of sagittal imbalance of the growing spine.

resultsFifty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. We demonstrated that both the AOSpine score and the TLICS scores had a significant correlation for surgical management decision of spine trauma (p < 0.0001). We found a high concordance between surgical decision making in the pediatric clinical practice and the TLICS score. In our pediatric cohort, there were significantly more patients with TLICS ≥ 5 (n = 47, 87%) than with AOSpine score > 5 (n = 26, 46%, p < 0.0001). There were significantly more patients with TLICS ≥ 4 (n = 53, 98%), than with AOSpine score ≥ 4 (n = 42, 77%, p = 0.001). ConclusionsThe TLICS score was significantly more appropriate than the AOSpine score, for the surgical treatment decision in children, especially when considering the future risk of sagittal imbalance.

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraeThoracic VertebraeChildHumansInjury Severity ScoreReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesMagerlPediatricSpine growthSpine injurySurgeryTLICS

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.