ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2021
Destabilization and chaos induced by harvesting: insights from one-dimensional discrete-time models.
Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One-dimensional discrete-time population models are often used to investigate the potential effects of increasing harvesting on population dynamics, and it is well known that suitable harvesting rates can stabilize fluctuations of population abundance. However, destabilization is also a possible outcome of increasing harvesting even in simple models. We provide a rigorous approach to study when harvesting is stabilizing or destabilizing, considering proportional harvesting and constant quota harvesting, that are usual strategies for the management of exploited populations. We apply our results to some of the most popular discrete-time population models (quadratic, Ricker and Bellows maps). While the usual case is that increasing harvesting is stabilizing, we prove, somehow surprisingly, that increasing values of constant harvesting can destabilize a globally stable positive equilibrium in some cases; moreover, we give a general result which ensures that global stability can be shifted to observable chaotic dynamics by increasing one model parameter, and apply this result to some of the considered harvesting models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33475829What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.