Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33475820›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2021

Vertebral fracture: epidemiology, impact and use of DXA vertebral fracture assessment in fracture liaison services.

W F Lems, J Paccou, J Zhang, N R Fuggle, M Chandran, N C Harvey, C Cooper, K Javaid, S Ferrari, K E Akesson and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06687889 (The Effect of Abdominal and Lumbar Muscle Stiffness Assessed by Elastography on Vertebral Fractures), which is not on this map. Cited by 73 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06687889 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Abdominal and Lumbar Muscle Stiffness Assessed by Elastography on Vertebral Fractures: A Cross-Sectional Study in Women Over 60

TypeobservationalSponsorAnkara City Hospital BilkentRan2024 to 2025Enrolled81ConditionsOsteoporosis in Post-menopausal Women, Vertebral Body Fractures, Balance, PosturalArmsElastography Measurements, Bone Mineral Density Measurement (DEXA), Berg balance scale, Functional reach test, Timed Up and Go Test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Updated practice guideline for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Bone health in patients with cancer: a SEOM-SEIOMM consensus review of risk factors, assessment strategies, and management approaches.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Incidence of first and subsequent fractures in multiple myeloma patients: a parallel cohort study using UK CPRD dataset.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  11. Management of skeletal-related events and fracture prevention in systemic mastocytosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Patient education following vertebral fragility fracture: a scoping review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Barriers and solutions for global access to osteoporosis management: a Position Paper from the International Osteoporosis Foundation.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

W F LemsAmsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. wf.lems@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6885-3953
J PaccouDepartment of Rheumatology, Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, MABLab ULR 4490, 59000, Lille, France.
J ZhangMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
N R FuggleMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
M ChandranOsteoporosis and Bone Metabolism Unit, Department of Endocrinology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
N C HarveyMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
C CooperMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
K JavaidNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Orthopaedic Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
S FerrariClinical Service and Research Laboratory of Bone Diseases, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.
K E AkessonDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Department of Orthopaedics, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
International Osteoporosis Foundation Fracture Working Group
MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit · GBLund University · SENuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBSingapore General Hospital · SGAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLUniversité de Lille · FRUniversité de Picardie Jules Verne · FRAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLHôpital Beau-Séjour · CH

Funding

Medical Research Council G0400491Medical Research Council G0601019Medical Research Council MC_PC_21000Medical Research Council MC_PC_21001Medical Research Council MC_PC_21003Medical Research Council MC_U147585819Medical Research Council MC_U147585824Medical Research Council MC_U147585827Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1014Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1015Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/2Medical Research Council MR/J000094/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebral fractures are independent risk factors for vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. Since vertebral fractures are often missed, the relatively new introduction of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) for imaging of the lateral spine during DXA-measurement of the spine and hips may contribute to detect vertebral fractures. We advocate performing a VFA in all patients with a recent fracture visiting a fracture liaison service (FLS). Fracture liaison services (FLS) are important service models for delivering secondary fracture prevention for older adults presenting with a fragility fracture. While commonly age, clinical risk factors (including fracture site and number of prior fracture) and BMD play a crucial role in determining fracture risk and indications for treatment with antiosteoporosis medications, prevalent vertebral fractures usually remain undetected. However, vertebral fractures are important independent risk factors for future vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. A development of the DXA technology, vertebral fracture assessment (VFA), allows for assessment of the lateral spine during the regular DXA bone mineral density measurement of the lumbar spine and hips. Recent approaches to the stratification of antiosteoporosis medication type according to baseline fracture risk, and differences by age in the indication for treatment by prior fracture mean that additional information from VFA may influence initiation and type of treatment. Furthermore, knowledge of baseline vertebral fractures allows reliable definition of incident vertebral fracture events during treatment, which may modify the approach to therapy. In this manuscript, we will discuss the epidemiology and clinical significance of vertebral fractures, the different methods of detecting vertebral fractures, and the rationale for, and implications of, use of VFA routinely in FLS. • Vertebral fracture assessment is a tool available on modern DXA instruments and has proven ability to detect vertebral fractures, the majority of which occur without a fall and without the signs and symptoms of an acute fracture. • Most osteoporosis guidelines internationally suggest that treatment with antiosteoporosis medications should be considered for older individuals (e.g., 65 years +) with a recent low trauma fracture without the need for DXA. • Younger individuals postfracture may be risk-assessed on the basis of FRAX® probability including DXA and associated treatment thresholds. • Future fracture risk is markedly influenced by both site, number, severity, and recency of prior fracture; awareness of baseline vertebral fractures facilitates definition of true incident vertebral fracture events occurring during antiosteoporosis treatment. • Detection of previously clinically silent vertebral fractures, defining site of prior fracture, might alter treatment decisions in younger or older FLS patients, consistent with recent IOF-ESCEO guidance on baseline-risk-stratified therapy, and provides a reliable baseline from which to define new, potentially therapy-altering, vertebral fracture events.

Indexed as

OsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesSpinal FracturesAbsorptiometry, PhotonAgedBone DensityHumansBone mineral density (BMD)epidemiologyFracture liaison service (FLS)OsteoporosisVertebral fractureVertebral fracture assessment (VFA)

Identifiers

PMID33475820
PMCPMC7929949
OpenAlexW3121223411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.